starting to notice the same low post count members flood every kendrick thread with stan takes![]()
I was there to experience both, thought Kendrick had a much better yearEven laughable to make that comparison as its an insult to Kendrick.
another

starting to notice the same low post count members flood every kendrick thread with stan takes![]()
I was there to experience both, thought Kendrick had a much better yearEven laughable to make that comparison as its an insult to Kendrick.
starting to notice the same low post count members flood every kendrick thread with stan takes![]()
Pac 96 was in his prime artistically, Kendrick's peak was like 7+ years , so this is not a fair question. I think the crazy thing with this year of Kendrick is it's so far in his career, no one had such a year so long after he entered the game. Kendrick checked the longevity with this year as well
How is that Kendrick stan post? I was implying Pac 96 year was greater but providing context...another![]()