Yes, she did. You can argue how effective she would be in achieving her policy goals, but pretending she didn't run on a "progressive platform nor a liberal one" is just not an honest assessment. I am talking purely about domestic policy that would benefit the working-class, which polled better than what Trump was offering in a blind survey, and was soundly rejected. Her refusal to break with Biden on lethal aid and foreign policy, her alignment with neocons, campaigning alongside Liz Cheney -- these are contemptible and dangerous positions that absolutely deserve criticism -- but that doesn't erase the broader platform she ran on.
Today, the Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy PAC (CFFE PAC) and Priorities USA launched a new digital ad campaign highlighting Vice President Kamala Harris’ dedication to ensuring American families have access to affordable, high-quality child care, and paid family leave.
priorities.org
Kamala Harris has rolled out some plans for the economy and other key issues for Americans.
www.cbsnews.com
In policy proposals, speeches and rallies, Vice President Kamala Harris has voiced support for continuing many of President Joe Biden's measures, but Harris is expected to put her own stamp and style on matters ranging from abortion to the economy to immigration.
www.cnn.com
Updated with additional promises, Oct. 14, 2024. Presidential campaigns usually plan their policy agendas months, or yea
www.politifact.com
That is all squarely within the liberal-to-progressive policy space.