Your prediction?


  • Total voters
    88

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,365
Reputation
7,341
Daps
153,191
Reppin
CookoutGang
Yes, I do not believe these organizations should be putting their thumbs on the scale trying to influence primaries. It delegitimizes elections, which voters see as a problem for Democrats. The sole purpose should be to elect Democrat senators and congressmen in the general election.
Interesting. So what harm are they doing here?

AOC is not part of the leadership at the DCCC. If she were, I would agree that she shouldn’t be endorsing candidates. If you want to be part of those committees, like the Gillibrands of the world, then you should stay out of primaries.
Just seems odd. The primary purpose of these organizations is to maintain incumbents. Those same incumbents who by and large are involved in the fundraising for the senators or congressmen.

It seems you're putting arbitrary limitations on "leadership" to fit some other agenda. I'd rather you just come out and say it.


Or we can troll and I could say, isn't AOC part of leadership? She's a lead progressive. She's a leader on the house oversight committee. She's actively involved in policy making and party brand recognition.

Just seems odd. Particularly when we say party leadership is out of touched and not liked. Why does it matter who they endorse?

I personally think it's good leadership to put yiur opinions out on which candidates you prefer and possibly have a great chance of working with and pushing through an agenda.

In an ideal world that would keep you from having your Fettermans, Manchin, and sinemas.

The problem isn't party leadership endorsing candidates as much as it seems you just don't like party leadership.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,562
Reputation
3,227
Daps
153,201
Interesting. So what harm are they doing here?

A lot of harm, these organizations have delegitimized elections for democrats in the eyes of the public
Just seems odd. The primary purpose of these organizations is to maintain incumbents. Those same incumbents who by and large are involved in the fundraising for the senators or congressmen.

Yes in the general election not in democrat primaries
It seems you're putting arbitrary limitations on "leadership" to fit some other agenda. I'd rather you just come out and say it.
Um no
Or we can troll and I could say, isn't AOC part of leadership? She's a lead progressive. She's a leader on the house oversight committee. She's actively involved in policy making and party brand recognition.

AOC isn't even apart of these organizations
Just seems odd. Particularly when we say party leadership is out of touched and not liked. Why does it matter who they endorse?

Yes they're out of touch which is why they're trying to put their thumb on the scale to pick weak candidates in both Maine and Michigan
I personally think it's good leadership to put yiur opinions out on which candidates you prefer and possibly have a great chance of working with and pushing through an agenda.

Disagree
In an ideal world that would keep you from having your Fettermans, Manchin, and sinemas.

That's what both candidates in Michigan and Maine they're backing is
The problem isn't party leadership endorsing candidates as much as it seems you just don't like party leadership.
I dont think party leadership or committee should ever be influencing dem primaries, they're needed for the general election against Republicans
 
Top