Interesting. So what harm are they doing here?Yes, I do not believe these organizations should be putting their thumbs on the scale trying to influence primaries. It delegitimizes elections, which voters see as a problem for Democrats. The sole purpose should be to elect Democrat senators and congressmen in the general election.
Just seems odd. The primary purpose of these organizations is to maintain incumbents. Those same incumbents who by and large are involved in the fundraising for the senators or congressmen.AOC is not part of the leadership at the DCCC. If she were, I would agree that she shouldn’t be endorsing candidates. If you want to be part of those committees, like the Gillibrands of the world, then you should stay out of primaries.
It seems you're putting arbitrary limitations on "leadership" to fit some other agenda. I'd rather you just come out and say it.
Or we can troll and I could say, isn't AOC part of leadership? She's a lead progressive. She's a leader on the house oversight committee. She's actively involved in policy making and party brand recognition.
Just seems odd. Particularly when we say party leadership is out of touched and not liked. Why does it matter who they endorse?
I personally think it's good leadership to put yiur opinions out on which candidates you prefer and possibly have a great chance of working with and pushing through an agenda.
In an ideal world that would keep you from having your Fettermans, Manchin, and sinemas.
The problem isn't party leadership endorsing candidates as much as it seems you just don't like party leadership.