Honestly I think the “qualified” conversation is a trap they created for themselves. Yelling about your qualifications is irrelevant when nearly every candidate went to an Ivy League school, or a good law school. The question should either be what do you believe or what have you done. I don’t care what your job was. What do you believe?
Kamala started that asinine “most qualified person of all time” shyt and it was laughable to anyone with a brain. How was she more qualified than George HW Bush? No idea. But the more people talk about academic achievement or government positions you have, the less they talk about what you believe or will do. Crockett didn’t have an “issues” page on her site for weeks. Because the campaign wasn’t about issue, it was about her. Saying “I’m the most qualified so give me the nomination” never works yet these people keep trying it.
HW's qualifications are highly overstated, he never even won statewide before being VP.
There is reporting that Barbara didnt even want him to take some of his posts and he wasn't excited about some of them (I can't remember if it was CIA Director or RNC Chairman).
He has a solid resume I guess, CIA Director, RNC Chair, US Ambassador to China, military vet, etc. But how many Presidents held those posts before ascending to the Presidency? I can't think of any. None of them are traditional prerequisites to the role (like being a Governor, Senator, etc.)
And Kamala was a DA, Attorney General and US Senator to the largest state in the union, he doesnt blow her out of the water.