The term cherry picking is wild subjective. My definition is when someone feels that a reward is much greater than the risk. The question isn’t whether or not we knew the fight would be close but what were Canelo’s chances of winning? I believe Oscar did the same with Sturm. You have to add the fact of the odds of Bivol winning by decision. The cards went Oscar’s way but most thought Sturm won. It didn’t go Canelo’s way, that doesn’t mean him or his team didn’t think it would especially him getting the benefit of the doubt in a close fight.
Me personally I am not calling it that but in many minds a cherry picking can simply mean that there are fights that can be made with bigger names and tougher opponents. Roach for sure was a cherry pick because Tank always saying such and such ain’t done shyt yet yielding to Roach who has accomplished a lot less.
I'm not mad at that even though it was bullshyt it wasn't called a knock down. If it was called in real time it could change the way Tank and Roach fought the rest of the fight so going back and changing that ruling would've been some bullshyt IMO.
I'm all for the Turki takeover too, but Dana White working with Turki is troublesome.so at this point, Tank can't lose. They literally won't let it happen. If he's the A side, You HAVE to knock him out.
I can't wait for the Turki takeover to be complete.
Get this corrupt bullshyt out of boxing. Get all this out of here.
so at this point, Tank can't lose. They literally won't let it happen. If he's the A side, You HAVE to knock him out.
I can't wait for the Turki takeover to be complete.
Get this corrupt bullshyt out of boxing. Get all this out of here.
That definitely stood out to meTeddy atlas made a good point. After roach started winning tank started tapping roach after rounds as to say good round. Could be wrong, but haven’t noticed that from him before. No bully behavior![]()