1. It’s too early to make this claim.
2. These are old ports. Most people buying Cyberpunk and the like are double dipping.
3. Nintendo fans buy non-Nintendo games, but they have to perform well. If a publisher gives a half-ass lazy port than the sales will reflect that.
1. It’s too early to make this claim.
2. These are old ports. Most people buying Cyberpunk and the like are double dipping.
3. Nintendo fans buy non-Nintendo games, but they have to perform well. If a publisher gives a half-ass lazy port than the sales will reflect that.
What kind of performance do I expect from a new system that cost $500 and markets itself as on par with current gen consoles?
I would expect that The fact you're making an excuse for underperforming is making my point. Doesn't the Nintendo chip use nvidia upscaling n shyt? WTF, it can't run Pong with motion blur? GTFOH
That’s why I been making fun of grown ass nikkaz who buy that bullshyt. You got grown ass nikkaz who don’t have kids playing them kiddie ass games and if a third party game does go on it the performance is abysmal compared to a Console or PC. Like you are a straight cooked ass nikka if you grown and playing a game like cyber punk on there. I have no doubt in my mind you smell like a smash brothers tournament stank ass grown Nintendo nikka.
Nintendo is for those rainy days when you wanna sit inside and play Mario Kart, Zelda etc.
If I'm trying to play BG3 or AC Shadows or some shyt, I'm not using Nintendo to do it. I get why devs port shyt over to Switch (huge user base), but it's not worth it.
So now when we inside next to our capable systems, that's when we want to play Mario Kart because that reigns supreme.
What is your friend code by the way, I wanna be friends with you. Will you be my friend? I'm really friendly
What's crazy is when a popular game sells on nintendo, then people use those sales to justify why everything else on that system is abysmal.
Why does it matter that Nintendo can sometimes make games that sell insanely well and other times they don't and you just keep it moving like it never happened? And then you say "And they bringing over Harry Potter "
Then time began for you when the Wii came out? You could argue N64 because devs didn't have to pay as much to make CD based games over cartridges. And nintendo's policies that was not friendly. Think of what Apple is guilty of doing these days in that department? Nintendo was worse
But before that 3rd party went to Nintendo to shine bruh
1. It’s too early to make this claim.
2. These are old ports. Most people buying Cyberpunk and the like are double dipping.
3. Nintendo fans buy non-Nintendo games, but they have to perform well. If a publisher gives a half-ass lazy port than the sales will reflect that.
1.) Its been 2 weeks, if you haven't sold shyt then it is what it is
2.) I'd say they are playing for the first time more so than what you said but either way, you're making excuses
3.)Sure but that's not the issue now or even in recent history. As most have said, why buy 3rd party games on Nintendo?
If its your only console then that's a reason. Otherwise, couldn't be me. I always find it sad when I see Nintendo threads on 3rd party games.
They be getting excited for throwaway ports like if its a 3rd world country thread
Nintendo is for those grown ass nikkaz who don’t have kids and don’t know what toilet paper or deodorant sticks is
If I'm trying to play BG3 or AC Shadows or some shyt, I'm not using Nintendo to do it. I get why devs port shyt over to Switch (huge user base), but it's not worth it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
The fact you're making an excuse for underperforming is making my point. Doesn't the Nintendo chip use nvidia upscaling n shyt? WTF, it can't run Pong with motion blur? GTFOH
"
