43 years: Was the judge to harsh?

Was she foul?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • No

    Votes: 16 76.2%
  • Damn

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Clout Chasing

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    21

romeodunn

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
269
Reputation
118
Daps
1,361
Dude was a repeat offender who had been given many chances before. He was a menace, I probably would have given him 20 years not 43. But he was on demon time his entire adult life, he would have killed someone eventually.
 

Commish

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
7,351
Reputation
2,687
Daps
24,459
I don't feel sorry for dude. He took penitentiary chances and got what he was asking for...

One could say that the judge was harsh. One could say that the judge over sentenced the convicted man due to racial bias.

But, when a person makes a choice to do home invasions and threaten people's lives, then whatever outcome that comes with it is what it is..
 
Top