47 Democrats Cave On Net Neutrality After GOP Calls Bill 'Dead On Arrival'

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,309
Reputation
4,575
Daps
89,512
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
47 Democrats Cave On Net Neutrality After GOP Calls Bill 'Dead On Arrival'

Forty-seven Democratic members of Congress are calling for a net neutrality compromise with Republicans, who have refused to support a full restoration of the net neutrality rules repealed by the Ajit Pai-led Federal Communications Commission. The Democratic-majority U.S. House of Representatives voted in April to pass the Save the Internet Act, which would restore the Obama-era FCC's net neutrality rules. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declared the bill "dead on arrival" in the Republican-majority Senate.

Republican lawmakers say they'll only accept a net neutrality law that isn't as strict -- even though large majorities of both Democratic and Republican voters support the FCC's old net neutrality rules. On Wednesday, dozens of Democrats asked their party leadership to compromise with the GOP leadership. "We, the undersigned, voted for [the Save the Internet Act] because it represented an opportunity to resolve questions that courts have struggled with for decades," the Democrats wrote in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). "At the same time, we recognize that this legislation is unlikely to become law, or pass through the Senate, in its current form. If that proves true, consumers will be left without enforceable net neutrality protections while partisan conflict continues. We believe this result is unacceptable and unnecessary." The letter to Pelosi was led by Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Scott Peters (D-Calif.) and signed by another 45 Democratic members of the House. It goes on to suggest that the House create "a bipartisan working group" that would write a net neutrality law that's acceptable to Republican lawmakers.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,617
Reputation
-2,814
Daps
36,776
Have any of those doomsday prophesies come to pass, without "net neutrality"?
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,776
Reputation
5,511
Daps
89,544
Reppin
The Arsenal
well since it takes both chambers for a bill to become a law (in addition to the president signing it), the democrats are in no position to dictate how pure they want the law to be. so it's either compromise on a bill or their best bet is to win the presidency and appoint their commissioners and change it back.

and why would the doomsday prophesies come to pass already. that's not how it works. the telcoms just want the power to be able to do it and they will slowly start to change things until we have a new normal and little complaint.
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
29,803
Reputation
6,520
Daps
113,820
Reppin
New York City
well since it takes both chambers for a bill to become a law (in addition to the president signing it), the democrats are in no position to dictate how pure they want the law to be. so it's either compromise on a bill or their best bet is to win the presidency and appoint their commissioners and change it back.

and why would the doomsday prophesies come to pass already. that's not how it works. the telcoms just want the power to be able to do it and they will slowly start to change things until we have a new normal and little complaint.

Exactly, change happens and people don’t realize it. These companies are trying to increase their profit over decades.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,309
Reputation
4,575
Daps
89,512
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
can you explain why you support a monopoly like comcast being given the ability to throttle its service :yeshrug:i have no interest in that as a consumer
Opposing further government intervention into this sector, isn’t the same thing as supporting a monopoly. Especially when government created the monopoly by granting 100 of millions in subsidies to these ISP’s.


I am weighing potential problems we could face from more intervention against throttled service, and/or some premium service feature.

:manny:
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,985
Reputation
2,579
Daps
58,835
Reppin
Raleigh
well since it takes both chambers for a bill to become a law (in addition to the president signing it), the democrats are in no position to dictate how pure they want the law to be. so it's either compromise on a bill or their best bet is to win the presidency and appoint their commissioners and change it back.

and why would the doomsday prophesies come to pass already. that's not how it works. the telcoms just want the power to be able to do it and they will slowly start to change things until we have a new normal and little complaint.

Nah compromise means we're getting fukked. It was just fine, then they took it off, now we're compromising? On what? A free fukking internet VS what?

These fukks get donations from the isps too. Democrats fukked us, AGAIN.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
20,776
Reputation
5,511
Daps
89,544
Reppin
The Arsenal
Nah compromise means we're getting fukked. It was just fine, then they took it off, now we're compromising? On what? A free fukking internet VS what?

These fukks get donations from the isps too. Democrats fukked us, AGAIN.
trump's fcc ended net neutrality because they could and the voters gave him that power. i'm in favor of leaving things the way they are and avoiding any congressional action because a goo deal is impossible with republicans controlling the senate and the white house. might as well just hope for a 2020 electoral victory and change it back.
 
Top