50 Cent Says Jay Z Will Fail In Boxing Promotion

[Master Teacher]

Why are u putting so much effort trying to convince me Jay is getting an even split? Get his d1kk out ya mouf, Beyonce gone get jealous. Hoe azz n1gga

I'm not convincing you anything I'm telling fact, in order to have a partnership there has to be EQUAL STAKE, its a fact not an opinion

dumb ass nikka learn something

 

[Tony D'Amato]

I'm not convincing you anything I'm telling fact, in order to have a partnership there has to be EQUAL STAKE, its a fact not an opinion

dumb ass nikka learn something

Stop quoting me u fukking hoe.


You're not even making sense. This partnership sh1t is drivel that u dont even have proof of. U havent read their contracts, so shut the fukk up

 

[Master Teacher]

Stop quoting me u fukking hoe.


You're not even making sense. This partnership sh1t is drivel that u dont even have proof of. U havent read their contracts, so shut the fukk up

It's called press release

http://variety.com/2013/biz/news/ro...caa-to-co-represent-robinson-cano-1200331923/

 

[Tony D'Amato]

It's called press release

http://variety.com/2013/biz/news/ro...caa-to-co-represent-robinson-cano-1200331923/

Confuse a press release w/ a legal document brehs. U are mentally retarded.

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

I'm not convincing you anything I'm telling fact, in order to have a partnership there has to be EQUAL STAKE, its a fact not an opinion

dumb ass nikka learn something

first off... that is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FALSEHOOD

a partnership does NOT have to be 50/50... my god.. a simple google would answer that in 5 seconds.. shyt you don't even have to have 2 people... you can have a partnership with 150 people if you want to

jay-z founded roc nation in 2008.. he then signed a deal with live nation for 10 years for touring.. another deal with another company for publishing.. and yet another company for distribution

he then made a deal with CAA to do sports management and partnered up with their company


nobody truly knows the split and none of it was ever reported.... the closest you ever will see is on the live nation deal... but the roc sports wasn't ever reported on the split



With bands like Paramore signing “360″ deals , which give the major labels a cut of revenues from concerts, merchandise and recordings, Live Nation has begun nosing into the labels’ territory with these superstar deals in an effort to control more elements of artists’ careers. According to the Times, Live Nation is expected to contribute $5 million a year in overhead for five years, plus $25 million to finance Jay-Z’s acquisitions or investments on behalf of the new company, Roc Nation, which will split profits with Live Nation. The rapper will also reportedly get an upfront payment of $25 million, an advance of $25 million that includes fees for his current tour and advances of $10 million per album for a minimum of three albums during the deal’s 10-year term. Another $20 million is included in the package in exchange for some publishing, licensing and other rights.


so if jay and live are already splitting the profits on anything roc nation related... then how is it 50/50 when they added caa??? that's already 3 different entities, not counting any silent partners and whoever else is involved... and the fact that it doesn't have to be 50/50 in the first place

 

[Master Teacher]

first off... that is a COMPLETE AND TOTAL FALSEHOOD

a partnership does NOT have to be 50/50... my god.. a simple google would answer that in 5 seconds.. shyt you don't even have to have 2 people... you can have a partnership with 150 people if you want to

jay-z founded roc nation in 2008.. he then signed a deal with live nation for 10 years for touring.. another deal with another company for publishing.. and yet another company for distribution

he then made a deal with CAA to do sports management and partnered up with their company


nobody truly knows the split and none of it was ever reported.... the closest you ever will see is on the live nation deal... but the roc sports wasn't ever reported on the split



With bands like Paramore signing “360″ deals , which give the major labels a cut of revenues from concerts, merchandise and recordings, Live Nation has begun nosing into the labels’ territory with these superstar deals in an effort to control more elements of artists’ careers. According to the Times, Live Nation is expected to contribute $5 million a year in overhead for five years, plus $25 million to finance Jay-Z’s acquisitions or investments on behalf of the new company, Roc Nation, which will split profits with Live Nation. The rapper will also reportedly get an upfront payment of $25 million, an advance of $25 million that includes fees for his current tour and advances of $10 million per album for a minimum of three albums during the deal’s 10-year term. Another $20 million is included in the package in exchange for some publishing, licensing and other rights.


so if jay and live are already splitting the profits on anything roc nation related... then how is it 50/50 when they added caa??? that's already 3 different entities, not counting any silent partners and whoever else is involved... and the fact that it doesn't have to be 50/50 in the first place

I already said that

I partnership is one and more parties, but's an EQUAL STAKE

When Jay at a partnership with Rocfella, it was 3 partners, 3 EQUAL STAKES


The patnership is between Roc Nation Sports one party and CAA another, there are two partners not a third so it's a split

only time a partnership isn't 50/50 is when its more than one partner I already said that

I own a LLC, and I have a partnership I know the difference

 

[Master Teacher]

Confuse a press release w/ a legal document brehs. U are mentally retarded.

Why would they announce to the worlds they are partner if they not can be easily vetted

if I was doing business with them I request to see those documents but I'm not

did you need to see documents to beliee Dame and Biggs were his partners with the ROC

CAA says their partners, ROC Nation sports says their partners, but I guess they are lying for the sake of what again

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

I already said that

I partnership is one and more parties, but's an EQUAL STAKE

When Jay at a partnership with Rocfella, it was 3 partners, 3 EQUAL STAKES


The patnership is between Roc Nation Sports one party and CAA another, there are two partners not a third so it's a split

only time a partnership isn't 50/50 is when its more than one partner I already said that

I own a LLC, and I have a partnership I know the difference

but that's wrong... i can go into a partnership at 60/40.. so what are you talking about

 

[Master Teacher]

but that's wrong... i can go into a partnership at 60/40.. so what are you talking about

I AM IN A PARTNERSHIP NOW I'M NOT WRONG

60/40 would be a JOINT VENTURE or limited parnership

Being in a business partnership is the same as being married

 

[eastside313]

I already said that

I partnership is one and more parties, but's an EQUAL STAKE

When Jay at a partnership with Rocfella, it was 3 partners, 3 EQUAL STAKES


The patnership is between Roc Nation Sports one party and CAA another, there are two partners not a third so it's a split

only time a partnership isn't 50/50 is when its more than one partner I already said that

I own a LLC, and I have a partnership I know the difference

Rocafella was owned by more than 3 people.

And if you have a llc then you should know that the paperwork ask for percentages of ownership. It does not have to be equal shares.

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

I AM IN A PARTNERSHIP NOW I'M NOT WRONG

60/40 would be a JOINT VENTURE or limited parnership

Being in a business partnership is the same as being married

fam... give it up... YOU ARE STILL WRONG

The Basics

Because partnerships are so easily created, you'll want to choose your partners carefully and, wherever possible, enter into a partnership with a written document that guides the behavior of all parties. Without a written agreement, partners are required to follow certain rules for partnerships. For example, in the absence of a written agreement, partners can't draw a salary and instead share profits equally. Even if you're doing 80% of the work and your partner only 20%, without a written document to the contrary, you must split profits evenly.

Yet another reason to choose partners wisely is that all partners share equal authority to bind the partnership to business deals and debt obligations. This means that if your partner enters into a contract with an overpriced supplier, the partnership is responsible for the contract, and as you'll see below, you are personally liable for the debt if the partnership can't pay it.

- See more at: http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/in...imited-partnerships.html#sthash.WxSOsMF5.dpuf





yes they are GENERALLY 50/50 but you can easily write into the contract, that one partner gets more of the profits, and it still be called a partnership

as the dude above was saying.. unless you have personally seen the contracts, you have zero idea of what is going on in the contract... how many times we seen press about what a person is getting or got... then years later they crying about how they never got any of that shyt cause they never read the contract in full


you can say whatever you want to in the press... at no time did they ever say anything was 50/50 or describe what the split was.. and never will you ever see that contract to know it's 50/50 either

you think a billion dollar company like caa is gonna equally split profits with a company who just started doing sports the moment they signed with them???

it's the same thing when jay-z "owned" the nets and had all sorts of press and front row seats and blah blah blah... then they truth comes out he owns less than 1%... but are they gonna announce that?? fukk no.. they want it to look good and want fans to believe it's all jay-z or at least 10% or some shyt.. and i do believe he was called a "partner" in the nets deal too


believe in entertainment pr bullshyt brehs

 

[Master Teacher]

fam... give it up... YOU ARE STILL WRONG

The Basics

Because partnerships are so easily created, you'll want to choose your partners carefully and, wherever possible, enter into a partnership with a written document that guides the behavior of all parties. Without a written agreement, partners are required to follow certain rules for partnerships. For example, in the absence of a written agreement, partners can't draw a salary and instead share profits equally. Even if you're doing 80% of the work and your partner only 20%, without a written document to the contrary, you must split profits evenly.

Yet another reason to choose partners wisely is that all partners share equal authority to bind the partnership to business deals and debt obligations. This means that if your partner enters into a contract with an overpriced supplier, the partnership is responsible for the contract, and as you'll see below, you are personally liable for the debt if the partnership can't pay it.

- See more at: http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/in...imited-partnerships.html#sthash.WxSOsMF5.dpuf





yes they are GENERALLY 50/50 but you can easily write into the contract, that one partner gets more of the profits, and it still be called a partnership

as the dude above was saying.. unless you have personally seen the contracts, you have zero idea of what is going on in the contract... how many times we seen press about what a person is getting or got... then years later they crying about how they never got any of that shyt cause they never read the contract in full


you can say whatever you want to in the press... at no time did they ever say anything was 50/50 or describe what the split was.. and never will you ever see that contract to know it's 50/50 either

you think a billion dollar company like caa is gonna equally split profits with a company who just started doing sports the moment they signed with them???

it's the same thing when jay-z "owned" the nets and had all sorts of press and front row seats and blah blah blah... then they truth comes out he owns less than 1%... but are they gonna announce that?? fukk no.. they want it to look good and want fans to believe it's all jay-z or at least 10% or some shyt.. and i do believe he was called a "partner" in the nets deal too


believe in entertainment pr bullshyt brehs

https://www.sba.gov/content/partnerships

yes you can a right an ADDENDUM to any type of contractual agreement

but guess what, its a reason why a GENERAL PARTNERSHIP is EQUAL SHARED PROFITS

LIABILITY

Nobody is going to take equal liability without equal profits, unless you are despearate or a fool

first of Roc Nation is part of the partnership is to EXTEND THE BRANDS OF THE ATHLETES OUTSIDE OF SPORTS YOU MORON, ROC NATION SPORTS BUSINESS MODEL IS BRAND NEW IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT CAA ALREADY DOES

Also It's nothing like the NETS YOU NOIVCE

Jay-z has already been called a MINORITY OWNER, we already knew he owned a small pecentage

Roc Nation Sports is uder Roc Nation his OWN COMPANY he's the founder, it's NOTHING LIKE THE NETS

The guy who owns the Nets never said him Jay-Z were partners, it's always been know he's a MINORITY OWNER

he just owns shares in the nets just like Warren Buffet owns shares in Coke Cola but he doesn't OWN COKE COLA

goddamn you dumb ass fukk

stop copy and pasting shyt when you have never done business in your life

 

[mr x]

 

[Master Teacher]

Rocafella was owned by more than 3 people.

And if you have a llc then you should know that the paperwork ask for percentages of ownership. It does not have to be equal shares.

an LLC isn't a Partnership, an LLC is limited liabity Corporation, they aren't related

who were the other owners of the ROC, not DEF JAM, Rocafella

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

https://www.sba.gov/content/partnerships

yes you can a right an ADDENDUM to any type of contractual agreement

but guess what, its a reason why a GENERAL PARTNERSHIP is EQUAL SHARED PROFITS

LIABILITY

Nobody is going to take equal liability without equal profits, unless you are despearate or a fool

first of Roc Nation is part of the partnership is to EXTEND THE BRANDS OF THE ATHLETES OUTSIDE OF SPORTS YOU MORON, ROC NATION SPORTS BUSINESS MODEL IS BRAND NEW IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT CAA ALREADY DOES

Also It's nothing like the NETS YOU NOIVCE

Jay-z has already been called a MINORITY OWNER, we already knew he owned a small pecentage

Roc Nation Sports is uder Roc Nation his OWN COMPANY he's the founder, it's NOTHING LIKE THE NETS

The guy who owns the Nets never said him Jay-Z were partners, it's always been know he's a MINORITY OWNER

he just owns shares in the nets just like Warren Buffet owns shares in Coke Cola but he doesn't OWN COKE COLA

goddamn you dumb ass fukk

stop copy and pasting shyt when you have never done business in your life

so nobody would ever do that... but people and companies do it everyday

i'm sorry.. i didn't know you were jay-z's personal lawyer and had access to all his contracts

have blind faith in press releases brehs

you got the juice now