OG Talk
Archived
I have zero issue discussing the rape case. It's a part of his story, his life, etc. It happened, there was a case, there was evidence, you can find it online readily, etc. If the goal is to remember humans - not gods or idols - then we should examine the totality of their life. We should talk about the trial...and the clear shift in Kobe's life after the trial. The evolution Kobe took, going from a player who at one point was clowned and despised by some...to a player nearly universally beloved. A player who went out his way to mentor girls and women. That's an interesting conversation to have...and one that we can't have without acknowledging the case and what came afterward.
The ONLY reason to discuss this case after his death is to be salacious. You don’t HAVE to make this part of his life story in order to take him down a notch from “Hero to human”.
That’s a deliberate choice, that is used inconsistently and strategically.
Take race out of it, it’s a weird obsession we have with celebrities.
For example if your 86 year old uncle James dies and the newspaper features his obituary, they will only mention the positive occurrences of his life. That’s how the dead are honored.
They’re not gotta put a paragraph stating “ Uncle James was a plumber for 45 years, and survived by his wife and grandchildren. He also was arrested for a DUI and Hit and Run back in the summer of ‘67”
Or
“Aunt Helen died of cancer at age 58. She cheated on her husband at age 33 and filed bankruptcy at age 36”
Even though these may all be facts and “part of the whole story” people don’t bring it up during death while the family is grieving because it would be viewed as tacky and classless.
It’s weird how with certain celebrities. The media feels like it has no choice. We only examine the “totality of ones life” when there is an agenda to push. It’s usually financial.






