AquaCityBoy
Veteran
no way I'm marrying a woman who won't sign a pre-nup.
Then I hope the judge throws that pre-nup in the bushes.

no way I'm marrying a woman who won't sign a pre-nup.
I initiated my divorce. Best thing I ever did!![]()
You nikkas live in a fantasy land. Y'all need to quit watching celebrities and listening to these buthurt Internet personalities. In reality most married people are happy and most RESPONSIBLE marriages are successful. Most marriages ending in divorce, have no alimony allocated. Alimony and prenups are only issues for rich dudes marriying trophy wives. The rest of us don't have those concerns.
Also most divorces happen for a reason. It's an Internet myth that women are just up and leaving their husbands for no reason. More than likely the divorce is justified.
Also I don't understand how y'all run around rallying against singlemotherhood, but when it comes down to being responsible and starting a family of your own its always "I'm just fukking bytches out chea". Well "just fukking bytches" is the exact attitude that creates single mother and deadbeat daddies. The reason we have such a problem with singlemotherhood is because people want to get all the pleasure of sex, without taking on the responsibilty and the seriousness of swapping reproductive juice with another person.
The "don't get married" crew are advocating more single mothers and less responsibilty in the communty
at you nikkas
TO add insult to injury...if she gets pregnant by said mailman...the husband will have to pay child support after she divorces him...the law says, as long as they were legally binded together through the sanctity of marriage, it is still his child and therfore he is still responsible for said child
The obvious response to that would be:
"well he should have made her work--then she wouldn't have had time to cheat and be impregnanted by the mailman...he should have been "in control" of the situation.
OR
He's not a "victim"...his divorce and/or marriage was a "bad businsess decision", he lost out on his "contract"...besides..."men made the law anyway."
nothing surprising about these states which is why marriage should be destroyed by us men by no longer participating
Breh...these dudes will be 40+, flabby, receding hairline, dead end job but think they'll be able to stroll up to any 20 year old dime and sweep her off her feet. So delusional.
![]()
So if I cheat on my wife, we gonna get a divorce and she gone get car, house, kids etc.
But if she cheat and have a kid that's not mine the same as above still applies plus I'm still responsible for the kid that not mine.
![]()
you don't need a dime to be happy bruh.
Where did I ever state the contrary?
i dunno bout yall, but I'd rather not have a woman that is a child. I know theyre tough to find...
but if you need to have your girl obey you as opposed to act well due to character...better off being alone
This sounds silly because the end result is the same. If she obeys, she has good character. A woman that is a child? This doesnt make sense. My woman obeys and she is still very well rounded, grounded and pure in heart. She puts friends, before herself. This is the type of woman a man needs. You're creating division where it isnt needed.
I tell myself, if I can't control that woman, then she is not my woman...
A husband should be able to tell his wife what to eat, when to have babies, where she should work and how much she should work, what she should wear, where she should live, who can be her friends, when she can leave the house and come back...
Now, to all you weak dudes out there thinking I am being ridiculous...Let me clarify...
1) I am a man, so I stating this from a male perspective...If your wife/girlfriend wears the pants in the relationship, and that's what works for you...Then that's fine...At the end of the day, only 1 person can be in charge of the relationship...That 50/50 thing DOES NOT work...
2) As a man, I believe a husband should have the power to control his wife, but that DOES NOT mean he should abuse and disrespect his wife...It means he needs to be wise and intelligent to know when to assert his influence, and when to compromise, but in a tie breaker, he needs to have enough power and influence to tell his wife, "this is how it's going to be." And if he really has that power, then the wife will listen...
If you tell your wife to do something or not to do something, and that request is founded on logic and not some emotional insecurity, and your wife disagrees...Then you are a chump who probably shares that girl...
shut up man. your gimmick is tired
so damn even south american bytches ain't got a chance? :usure2:I will get married someday but I'm not sure it will be to a western woman....