Banning people because you disagree with them = an admission your positions are indefensible. Lets not be fakkits, friendsPlease start a thread with a poll.
@ThreeLetterAgency, @88m3, @Mephistopheles, @Robbie3000 must all atoneBanning people because you disagree with them = an admission your positions are indefensible. Lets not be fakkits, friendsPlease start a thread with a poll.
@ThreeLetterAgency, @88m3, @Mephistopheles, @Robbie3000 must all atoneBanning people because you disagree with them = an admission your positions are indefensible. Lets not be fakkits, friends@ThreeLetterAgency, @88m3, @Mephistopheles, @Robbie3000 must all atone
1. No it isn'tBanning people because you disagree with them = an admission your positions are indefensible. Lets not be fakkits, friends@ThreeLetterAgency, @88m3, @Mephistopheles, @Robbie3000 must all atone



You shouldn't let him get to you. He is more scared of you than you are of him.I got no problem with anyone else on this board other than Nappy...this fool spams this board all day with nonsense and is a reddit/ place that wont be mentioned plant...I can have constructive or fun conversation with everyone else you named but him...the second I put him on ignore HL became significantly better
1. No it isn't![]()
"Having a different position" is not what the primary basis for banning him would be. Neither @Swaggatron nor I made such a comment about anyone else whom we have different positions with.Explain how banning/censoring positions different from yours speak to your position being well thought out and rational.





The world needs betas and cucks as reference points
I know there's a gender pay gap, but did they pass you less as a man for acting like a bytch?
![]()

we may never see ole buddy again...his job is done:
@88m3 will you ban yourself and never return to HL?![]()