9 Devastating Actions White Slaves Masters Took to Convert Black People to Christianity

[joeychizzle]

 

[Michael9100]

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

Answer this, why don't you ever see white Christians offering public forgiveness to black people who kill white people?

Because white Christians = Devils. anybody can claim to be apart of something. Why would satan apology for hurting real Christians? Blacks are Christians by birthright. Whites are satanist who call theirselves Christians.

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

Well if he a black man that makes it worse.

It would makes sense. If GOD was black, and he made man in his image. And Israel is apart of the African plate, and his son had hair like wool , feet like burnt brass and YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO BOW TO A WHITE GOD, then you deserve all the fukkery headed your way

 

[Just like bruddas]

Jesus was black. The arabs were black.

 

[TooLazyToMakeUp1]

Religions emphasize that ALL humans are equal

'Equal Rights' is a religious idea.

Then explain the bible condoning slavery

"And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes."

"And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for ever."

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

​

Then explain the bible condoning slavery

"And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes."

"And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for ever."

I just LOVE when 'critics' take a verse out of context.......and by 'context' I mean socio-cultural context.

You see, when the text was written, 'freedom' was an ambiguous concept........

4.5 Slavery

4.5.1 Definition

Freedom in the ancient Near East was a relative, not an absolute state, as the ambiguity of the term for "slave" in all the region's languages illustrates. "Slave" could be used to refer to a subordinate in the social ladder. Thus the subjects of a king were called his "slaves," even though they were free citizens. The king himself, if a vassal, was the "slave" of his emperor; kings, emperors, and commoners alike were "slaves" of the gods. Even a social inferior, when addressing a social superior, referred to himself out of politeness as "your slave." There were, moreover, a plethora of servile conditions that were not regarded as slavery, such as son, daughter, wife, serf, or human pledge.

A better criterion for a legal definition of slavery is its property aspect, since persons were recognized as a category of properly that might be owned by private individuals. A slave was therefore a person to whom the law of property applied rather than family or contract law. Even this definition is not wholly exclusive, since family and contract law occasionally intruded upon the rules of ownership. Furthermore, the relationship between master and slave was subject to legal restrictions based on the humanity of the slave and concerns of social justice.

To add insult to injury, let's contrast what 'slavery' meant back then to what it meant in Colonial America......

http://www.dol.gov/dol/aboutdol/history/moynchapter3.htm
​

"[In the United States,] the slave was totally removed from the protection of organized society (compare the elaborate provisions for the protection of slaves in the Bible), his existence as a human being was given no recognition by any religious or secular agency, he was totally ignorant of and completely cut off from his past, and he was offered absolutely no hope for the future. His children could be sold, his marriage was not recognized, his wife could be violated or sold (there was something comic about calling the woman with whom the master permitted him to live a 'wife'), and he could also be subject, without redress, to frightful barbarities — there were presumably as many sadists among slaveowners, men and women, as there are in other groups. The slave could not, by law, be taught to read or write; he could not practice any religion without the permission of his master, and could never meet with his fellows, for religious or any other purposes, except in the presence of a white; and finally, if a master wished to free him, every legal obstacle was used to thwart such action. This was not what slavery meant in the ancient world, in medieval and early modern Europe, or in Brazil and the West Indies.

Anything else you need explained?


​

 

[No Sleep]

Old ass text breh...

 

[No Sleep]

nikka so Christian he down playing slavery and what black folks had to deal with if he is a black he is a white supremacist dream.

I never once read a slave narrative in French or any other language other than English. If these slaves had it so well and all could read and speak the English so well why do we have so few true slave narratives? Why are mean of the narratives we read full of broken English? I've always heard that massa allowed certain house nikkas to read so that they could read the bible on Sunday's to the plantation slaveys.

Are you not going question why blacks have it so hard on this planet when you're standing there for your mansion on the sunny paradise?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

nikka so Christian he down playing slavery and what black folks had to deal with if he is a black he is a white supremacist dream.

LOL, I'm a theological noncognitivist. I gave-up being an atheist a LONG time ago so I know ALL the arguments.

The truth of the matter is 'slavery' meant something totally different then and is proven by a multitude of artifacts/documents from Babylon, Akkad, Ugarit, Egypt, Assyria, etc.​

I never once read a slave narrative in French or any other language other than English.

Google Joanni Questy, Victor Séjour, Armand Lanusse, and Adolphe Duhart.

Their narratives were printed in about 160 French language newspapers in Louisiana.​

If these slaves had it so well and all could read and speak the English so well why do we have so few true slave narratives? Why are mean of the narratives we read full of broken English? I've always heard that massa allowed certain house nikkas to read so that they could read the bible on Sunday's to the plantation slaveys.

We have so few slave narratives because of 'White Supremacy'. Before the Civil War, 65 were published (ex.: Frederick Douglas). Post-Emancipation, there were 55 published (ex.: Booker T. Washington).

Nowhere did I state 'all slaves could read'. Literacy was about 50-60% among the 'White' population and lower for Africans/'Blacks', especially in the South.
​

Are you not going question why blacks have it so hard on this planet when you're standing there for your mansion on the sunny paradise?

Africans/'Blacks' DID question it, that's why there were so many slave revolts.​

 

[Poh SIti Dawn]

Why is the idea of atheism stupid? Please share

I just shared it in the post that I called it stupid in: snoop:

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Attacking ME isn't going to prove religion is 'bad' for 'Black' people.

If anything, what's been shown thus far is 'Black' critics/atheists are ignorant of their own peoples' history and have to resort to using very old, refuted, historically false arguments to cover-up a lack of knowledge.

Memes are not arguments or evidence.

They are the last resort of intellectually lazy people whose ideology is illogical and critically flawed.

​

 

[No Sleep]

LOL, I'm a theological noncognitivist. I gave-up being an atheist a LONG time ago so I know ALL the arguments.

The truth of the matter is 'slavery' meant something totally different then and is proven by a multitude of artifacts/documents from Babylon, Akkad, Ugarit, Egypt, Assyria, etc.​

Google Joanni Questy, Victor Séjour, Armand Lanusse, and Adolphe Duhart.

Their narratives were printed in about 160 French language newspapers in Louisiana.​

We have so few slave narratives because of 'White Supremacy'. Before the Civil War, 65 were published (ex.: Frederick Douglas). Post-Emancipation, there were 55 published (ex.: Booker T. Washington).

Nowhere did I state 'all slaves could read'. Literacy was about 50-60% among the 'White' population and lower for Africans/'Blacks', especially in the South.
​

Africans/'Blacks' DID question it, that's why there were so many slave revolts.​

Question it to who?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Question it to who?

One another.

Word to Toussaint Louverture and Henri Christophe.​

 

[No Sleep]

One another.

Word to Toussaint Louverture and Henri Christophe.​

I'm talking about God.