A lot of the 90s on who was culturally more important wasn't just based on a singular hit and record sales alone. Nobody I knew in real life gave a fukk about Paperboy, but he was up for a Grammy in 1994 because he had a hit song. But culturally he didn't rank. The reason guys like Big, Dre, Wu, Bone, Pac, Snoop, Treach ranked highly was because not only did they have sales but nikkas a part of Hip Hop were actually listening to their music. Not just white suburban kids that got them the plaques, but people within the community were bumping them non-stop. In the streets, in the schools, at parties, at clubs, etc...
There's a reason Redman was "Source Rapper of the Year" in 1993 with an album that barely touched Gold. Because during that time frame Redman was culturally the hottest (hottest not biggest) artist at the time in the East Coast. Even if you say "It's biased" and it should've been Snoop (true), but even accounting for regional bias, there were other East Coast acts that sold way more than Redman that wasn't as "hot" as Redman in the streets in real time.
You can't look at the 90s through a post 2003 lens.
There's a reason Redman was "Source Rapper of the Year" in 1993 with an album that barely touched Gold. Because during that time frame Redman was culturally the hottest (hottest not biggest) artist at the time in the East Coast. Even if you say "It's biased" and it should've been Snoop (true), but even accounting for regional bias, there were other East Coast acts that sold way more than Redman that wasn't as "hot" as Redman in the streets in real time.
You can't look at the 90s through a post 2003 lens.