this case was hard because the evidence the prosecution presented wasn't strong enough to overcome reasonable doubt.Some real insider shyt here: juries are becoming more and more skeptical of all law enforcement and legal systems. Cases like this are harder and harder. People don't believe anything anymore, even when they should
the people on the jury were sticklers for the law here. the court gave them instructions about what they could and couldn't use to decide the verdict. the evidence they were shown didn't meet the standard for conviction, so they didn't convict.
this is the opposite of lawless. this is what you need from juries if you're trying to have a fair legal system.