no he's not, only you areso you are saying what you wrote is bullshyt?

no he's not, only you areso you are saying what you wrote is bullshyt?

not surprised at this response really... you're another "agnostic atheist"no he's not, only you are![]()
Hope you ddin't just copy/paste what you read like he did 
I'm saying that you refuse to understand the following:so you are saying what you wrote is bullshyt?first you talk about logic and rationality. Then dismiss what you wrote and say something else? which is it?
![]()
I'm saying that you refuse to understand the following:
1. The burden of proof
2. The problem of induction
3. Empiricism
4. The scientific method
5. The difference and stark definition of agnosticism and atheism and why the two are inherently different
6. The definition of a fact
7. What an assertion is
8. Philosophical epistemology
outta here breh. I understand all that. I already poke holes into the bullshyt reasoning you keep on copy/pasting here. You can't school me on what you don't understand or explain without regurgitating something you saw somebody else write. And next time, before you start lecturing people about rationality and logic, try to avoid committing fallacies in your argument.Whats so hard for you to understand?outta here breh. I understand all that. I already poke holes into the bullshyt reasoning you keep on copy/pasting here. You can't school me on what you don't understand or explain without regurgitating something you saw somebody else write. And next time, before you start lecturing people about rationality and logic, try to avoid committing fallacies in your argument.
I posted the picture you copy/pasted on here for a reason: It contradicts what you are saying in writing(quoted).
Whats so hard for you to understand?
I, as an AGNOSTIC-ATHEIST, do not know if a god exists, but presently have no evidence to believe in one?
This is the evidence you provided to support your bullshyt argument.
Or are you saying this is wrong? if so why did you even post it?
Fam.![]()
This is the evidence you provided to support your bullshyt argument.
Or are you saying this is wrong? if so why did you even post it?
If you didn't mean to post it then I take back what i said![]()
Provide a link to your doctoral thesisYou're talking to someone who knows physics on a post-graduate level and you can't just bullshyt by speaking pretty.
So try this again with perverting established science with poetry and flowery language
No.Provide a link to your doctoral thesis
If there are infinite odds and something happened, then that means it wasn't impossible.I operate under the premise that life is an extraordinary miracle made possible against infinite odds, which is actually more of a fact than a premise. Once you recognize this simple truth the burden I believe is on the atheist to disprove a God or offer an explanation of how we even exist, or anything exist
son...you are boring the shyt out of me, I am gonna just skip your threads if this keeps upnot surprised at this response really... you're another "agnostic atheist"Hope you ddin't just copy/paste what you read like he did
![]()


