
Quoted again just to let y'all knowshyts going 7, GS comes out on top though.
I think we're gonna get back to back classics with the Warriors vs OKC/Cleveland
Are you going to acknowledge this or not @GoddamnyamanProf ?Every stat paints the Thunder as better, except one, and it's the one people have told me over and over on this board that doesn't matter - 3 point shooting.

This board is more stuck in 1985 than a Bears fan is the way they want to downplay the value of the 3. Talk about "they're just lucky they're hitting 3's"Every stat paints the Thunder as better, except one, and it's the one people have told me over and over on this board that doesn't matter - 3 point shooting.
It hurts less in blowouts. I said we'll win in 7, I stand by that. With that said I hope Warriors haters feast tonight. This team deserves to be roasted after a display like this. I'm still riding tho.
The game went down just as I said it would except the Thunder collapsed earlier than expected

He didn't, idiot.Russell Forcebrook will carry OKC to the promise land.![]()
Nah nikka, getting swept is much worse.Don't know what's going on with this thread, but obviously OKC blew a huge opportunity. With their roster, the only thing I would've changed is playing Morrow more in crunch time instead of either Waiters or Roberson, because Morrow is their best 3pt shooter and can help space the floor. In crunch time, Durant and Westbrook are going to take most of the shots, but they also get most of the attention, and the few times they do pass, the other players have to make the shot. The one play near the end when Durant passed it to Roberson (who was WIDE open), who passed it to Waiters (he missed), is a play where if Morrow was in place of Roberson, he most likely hits that shot. But man, blowing a 3-1 lead is probably worse than if they got swept.



