A Southern lawmaker called Lincoln a ‘tyrant’ and compared him to Hitler

[BlackFruitPunch]

The civil war was necessary because of growing discontent and hostility of the South. The north had two choices war or appeasement. Appeasement didn't guarantee avoiding war it only guaranteed a stronger south.

 

[DynamoEAR]

But the American Revolution was right? Right?

For Godsakes have some regard for your ancestors you worthless c00n.

How long exactly should your ancestors have remained slaves until the nastiest of the nastiest Cac in the antebellum South gained some humanity?

Funny given that South Carolina fired the first shot and people are asking is war necessary.

 

[Robbie3000]

I asked why exactly was the war necessary? and these were the responses...















Higher learning
Exactly the kind of shyt some of the above posters said they didnt want to see in Higher Learning
I love ya'll nikkas man

And I asked you if The Revolutionary war was necessary, but I see you are avoiding that question.

 

[DEAD7]

"fukking tyrant, how dare he undermine my right to own other human beings"

Do these people stop and think for even a second

He declared a war without the approval of congress and suspended habeas corpus imprisoning some 30.000 Americans without due process... if a president began doing that today you would call him a tyrant and want him forcibly removed from office Ya'll gotta stop acting like everything was kosher just cause you approve of how things ended.

 

[DEAD7]

And I asked you if The Revolutionary war was necessary, but I see you are avoiding that question.

I dont see how its relevant to whether or not Lincoln violated the constitution and declared an unnecessary war without the approval of congress... nor do i believe the colonies were free to succeed from Britain under any kind of constitution or agreement.
Not really even remotely similar situations.

But i'll humor you... no, Britain could have let the colonies go without conflict. War wasnt necessary.

TBH war is almost never necessary.

 

[Darth Nubian]

He declared a war without the approval of congress and suspended habeas corpus imprisoning some 30.000 Americans without due process... if a president began doing that today you would call him a tyrant and want him forcibly removed from office Ya'll gotta stop acting like everything was kosher just cause you approve of how things ended.

So imprisoning 30,000 people for the duration of a war is tyrannical and worthy of contempt, but enslaving hundreds of thousands of people for the course of their natural born life is something that should be worked out naturally on its own What's your angle breh?

 

[DEAD7]

So imprisoning 30,000 people for the duration of a war is tyrannical and worthy of contempt, but enslaving hundreds of thousands of people for the course of their natural born life is something that should be worked out naturally on its own What's your angle breh?

Who said or suggested anything close to that?
Believe it or not, you can oppose slavery and the course Lincoln took to end it.



Lincoln hated nikkas anyways and never opposed the laws banning them from his home state.
Ya'll gotta stop holding this white supremacist up like he really gave a fukk about ya'll.

 

[Robbie3000]

I dont see how its relevant to whether or not Lincoln violated the constitution and declared an unnecessary war without the approval of congress... nor do i believe the colonies were free to succeed from Britain under any kind of constitution or agreement.
Not really even remotely similar situations.

But i'll humor you... no, Britain could have let the colonies go without conflict. War wasnt necessary.

TBH war is almost never necessary.

It's the South that declared war not the other way around.

its like nikkas like you have no sense of self preservation. You are out here suggesting the North should have been gracious and accomodating to the South in the face of secession and preservation of one of the most brutal institutions in human history.

By the way, if I had to weigh the morality of upholding an agreement vs the freedom of 4 million people, then there is no question at all. Where the fukk is your morality?

On behalf of your ancestors, fukk you.

 

[DEAD7]

By the way, if I had to weigh the morality of upholding an agreement vs the freedom of 4 million people, then there is no question at all. Where the fukk is your morality?

Spoiler

The 4 million people were being freed either way in my honest opinion, but I understand why you are framing it that way.
You wanted brehs freed regardless of the cost.

 

[MMS]

That's his whole shtick. nikka looks like a cross between dastardly and muttley and capes for white folks. However even removing the c00nish caping from the equation he's an idiot. The south was becoming more and more displeased with the north culminating in secession. So the north had two options appease the south thus making them stronger, making the north's defeat more likely or go to war when they did while they still had a chance to win.

 

[Starman]

The civil war wasn't necessary

How could it have been avoided?

 

[DlAMONDZ]

No lies detected

They were both white supremacists, had slaves and committed genocide

 

[Trajan]

@DEAD7 been a shoe shine boy. Dude really believes in the system

Ain't no ideology bih

 

[JahFocus CS]

No lies detected

They were both white supremacists, had slaves and committed genocide

Lincoln held enslaved people?

 

[DlAMONDZ]

Lincoln held enslaved people?

Both ran a country that did