A Time magazine cover enrages teachers — again

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,477
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,777
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...a-time-magazine-cover-enrages-teachers-again/

Teachers Call For Boycott Against Time Magazine Over Critical Story on Tenure


imrs.php


The accompanying story is about the latest effort by school reformers to reduce or end teacher job protections (and therefore reduce or destroy the power of the teachers unions), highlighted best in a recent case titled Vergara v. California, in which a judge threw out state statutes giving tenure and other job protections to teachers. Campbell Brown, the former CNN anchor, has emerged as a leader of these new efforts to sue individual states with strong job protections for teachers.
Time’s article looks at wealthy philanthropists who have become involved in school reform, focusing on Silicon Valley entrepreneur David Welch, who started an organization called Students Matter, which started and funded the Vergara case. Teachers are furious, especially at the magazine cover, which they see as sending the message that there are loads of “rotten apples” that only “tech millionaires” know how remove from the classroom. Yet again, wealthy philanthropists and businessman are being cast as the saviors of public education when, in fact, they aren’t.

The American Federation of Teachers, the second largest teachers union in the country, started a petition demanding that Time apologize to teachers for its cover — not the accompanying article. It says in part:

…Time magazine is about to use its cover to blame teachers for the problems in America’s schools… Time’s cover doesn’t even reflect its own reporting. The Time article itself looks at the wealthy sponsors of these efforts. And while it looks critically at tenure, it also questions the testing industry’s connections to Silicon Valley and the motives of these players.
The cover is particularly disappointing because the articles inside the magazine present a much more balanced view of the issue. But for millions of Americans, all they’ll see is the cover and a misleading attack on teachers.

In the first day more than 50,000 people signed the petition.
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,335
Reputation
12,923
Daps
140,270
Reppin
Staff
A lot of the criticism is valid about firing bad teachers.

On a side note, I do have a question: Why do they never mention police unions? Why do conservatives, libertarians and the media remain silent on police unions? They are worse by far. I always found it strange why that is.

Because the Teacher's Union is full of blacks, gays, and women.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,477
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,777
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
A lot of the criticism is valid about firing bad teachers.

On a side note, I do have a question: Why do they never mention police unions? Why do conservatives, libertarians and the media remain silent on police unions? They are worse by far. I always found it strange why that is.
:sadcam:Tell me about it! The climate is right for an *anti union* push.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
Because the Teacher's Union is full of blacks, gays, and women.

Makes sense.

My theory was that conservatives and economic libertarians realize the police are the last barrier of Defense in protecting their corporate overlords.

Matter of fact, I don't take an anti-union person serious if there first beef isn't the police unions. You think firing a bad teacher is hard, wait until you read about criminal cops and bad cops. We had a cop down here who was fired 6 times and union got him his job back, despite him committing several crimes.
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,786
Reputation
2,708
Daps
67,063
Reppin
NYC
Makes sense.

My theory was that conservatives and economic libertarians realize the police are the last barrier of Defense in protecting their corporate overlords.

Matter of fact, I don't take an anti-union person serious if there first beef isn't the police unions. You think firing a bad teacher is hard, wait until you read about criminal cops and bad cops. We had a cop down here who was fired 6 times and union got him his job back, despite him committing several crimes.

But Many libertarians want to privatize the police and fire department
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,477
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,777
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
But Many libertarians want to privatize the police and fire department
Libertarians are rolled into the same ball as republicans on this board, and it is what it is :manny:.
I suggest not wasting time differentiating between the two, and pointing out the obvious differences, as they will fall just fall on deaf ears.
 

wheywhey

Pro
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
1,412
Reputation
520
Daps
2,026
A lot of the criticism is valid about firing bad teachers.

On a side note, I do have a question: Why do they never mention police unions? Why do conservatives, libertarians and the media remain silent on police unions? They are worse by far. I always found it strange why that is.

The criticism about bad teachers is fueled by private industry, charter schools in particular. Public primary and secondary education receives $600 billion a year and private businesses want a part of that, or all of it. Charter schools save money with non-union teachers. So the union needs to go.

What surprises me is how incompetent the teachers unions are at fighting back. They could come up with some agreement that would allow school districts to easily fire of the bottom 1% who are child molesters, drug addicts, or psychotic, but instead they do nothing. They aren't even complaining about the Time Magazine story, they just don't like the cover.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
But Many libertarians want to privatize the police and fire department

No doubt about it, but they can't take the chance of pissing off the police unions right now. They need the protection for their corporate overlords. Wealth inequality is becoming more and more evident by the day. Plus, the law enforcement in this country did a fine job serving private interests during the occupy movements.

American libertarians are pro-corporation and are for being ruled by the wealthy. Don't get it twisted. They will support anything that ensures that those things are met.
 
Top