Bboystyle
FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Goat with 1 ringgtfoh
Marino has NO rings and he was/is consider the GOAT. Unless u have a legitimate argument to back up your rings statement when comparing an individual then why bother coming in here to post smilies

Goat with 1 ringgtfoh

Marino has NO rings and he was/is consider the GOAT. Unless u have a legitimate argument to back up your rings statement when comparing an individual then why bother coming in here to post smilies![]()
If that's the case then Peyton already the goatIf that's the case then Peyton already the goat
He has all the records and a Super Bowl
Who the fukk called Marino the goat?Marino has NO rings and he was/is consider the GOAT. Unless u have a legitimate argument to back up your rings statement when comparing an individual then why bother coming in here to post smilies![]()

Who the fukk called Marino the goat?![]()

With that mentality you must think LeBron is the best to ever do itNot really considering i've seen all the QB's who were mentioned in here play. None of them have the total skill sets that Rodgers has. Its like he's all of them rolled into one. His biggest issue was holding onto the ball too long when he first started but now he has one of the quickest releases in the NFL.
Actually no.
Marino has and still is in the talks of being one of the GOATs.
live under a rock the past 30 years brehs
With that mentality you must think LeBron is the best to ever do it
Actually no.
The fact he has no rings is always mentioned as no placing him on the same level as the goats
Gtfoh

Trent Diller has a ringSo by your logic, Trent Diffler is better because he has a ring? or u not gonna count him because it doesnt work that way for certain players?![]()
Trent Diller has a ring
Did I say having a ring made u a goat?
I said not hang one is the issue
fukk kinda logic u got
My logic is based on watching the player play,.not count his damn rings. Football is a team sport, Brady isnt gonna win a SB if u put him on the Browns so stop with your flawed logic.

So that is your logic
![]()