yall losin to the seahawks or panthers in the second round anyway![]()

rodgers is a HoF-bound qb, and flynn is trash. the difference is huge, but packers arent a really good team even with rodgers, especially with him coming off the injury. I was specifically talking about nfc teams who are balling and in the offs, being scared. seahags beat them last year with arod healthy (even tho refs had a part in it), why would they be scared ? Niners beat em 3 times in a row over last 2 seasons, why would they be scared ? lol

their wins were browns, foreskins, vikings, lions and ravens. aka 4 teams that are out of offs and ravensPackers was 5-2 before A-Rod injury![]()
If you're QB gets hot you can win it all, you don't have to have a great "all around team". This is why his return is scary
The last 3 SB winners were above average teams whose QB just sonned everyone in the playoffs(29 TD's 3 Interceptions combined)

yeah that awful giant defense in 2011 shut out the falcons offense and held packers pats and 49ers to two offensive TDs each.so the defenses had nothing to do with it, right?![]()
their wins were browns, foreskins, vikings, lions and ravens. aka 4 teams that are out of offs and ravens
their losses were 49ers and bengals, aka two teams in the offs.
![]()
And yet the lions beat the Pack and the Vikes tie them w/o Rodgers.
all this shows that the packers are much worse without rodgers, it doesnt show that they were a really good, top flight team with him. stop it. your logic makes no sense.all this shows that the packers are much worse without rodgers, it doesnt show that they were a really good, top flight team with him. stop it. your logic makes no sense.