According to a British psychologist paedophilia should be considered a 'sexual orientation'

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

I dunno because i'm not attracted to children, just because you arent doesnt mean it's unfathomable that people are.
Your emotions on the situation doesn't change the realiy.

or because being attracted to children makes no biological or psychological sense. No one is saying that paedophiles don't exist. It's not a sexual orientation though. It's a fetish. Being attracted to the lack of development in a human being is not a sexual orientation, whether it's paedophila or that name for people who are attracted to teens that I can't remember. Why people have those fetishes can be argued, but it's not the same as being attracted to fertile women when you're a man. Or being attracted to big strong men when you're a woman. A child has literally nothing for an adult human to be attracted to.

 

[Pifferry]

or because being attracted to children makes no biological or psychological sense. No one is saying that paedophiles don't exist. It's not a sexual orientation though. It's a fetish. Being attracted to the lack of development in a human being is not a sexual orientation, whether it's paedophila or that name for people who are attracted to teens that I can't remember. Why people have those fetishes can be argued, but it's not the same as being attracted to fertile women when you're a man. Or being attracted to big strong men when you're a woman. A child has literally nothing for an adult human to be attracted to.

It hit's all the markers of being an orientation and not a fetish if you read the research, but we'll leave it at that because you aren't going to come around to this.
I have no vested interest in anything regarding pedo's anyways.

 

[tmonster]

i'm out of here
y'all can go nuts over nothing
been hearing this bullshyt for over 10 years

 

[Jack Trippa 3z company ho]

oh shyt...how many days do we have left?

No one knows. But it's progressing exactly as was foretold in the Bible.

 

[Jack Trippa 3z company ho]

what about the muslims?

What about them?

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

It hit's all the markers of being an orientation and not a fetish if you read the research, but we'll leave it at that because you aren't going to come around to this.
I have no vested interest in anything regarding pedo's anyways.

You're saying you're not invested but you're pushing that it's an orientation off the strength of studies you won't name, while not naming a reason for why it would be a natural development for an adult to be attracted to children.

Anyway, I'm just reacting off sensationalism. Pedos will continue to be stigmatized, and rightfully so.

 

[Pifferry]

You're saying you're not invested but you're pushing that it's an orientation off the strength of studies you won't name, while not naming a reason for why it would be a natural development for an adult to be attracted to children.

Anyway, I'm just reacting off sensationalism. Pedos will continue to be stigmatized, and rightfully so.

Pedo's being stigmatized leads towards them not being able to go out and get help from say a therapist without having their lives ruined, congregating together for support, normalizing their attraction, and potentially abusing children.
Child molesters should be stigmatized, not the other way around.
(pedophillia should be stigmatized though, I believe there's a difference between doing those two things)
There should be avenues for pedophiles provided by the government, I'm sure many of them would want to be chemically castrated so that should be made readily available.
And I don't have to explain what would make children attractive because I have no frame of reference for that, that is't a gotcha question.

 

[( ິΦᆺΦ)ິ°˚(✿ *҉ manko｡✧)]

Pedo's being stigmatized leads towards them not being able to go out and get help from say a therapist without having their lives ruined, congregating together for support, normalizing their attraction, and potentially abusing children.
Child molesters should be stigmatized, not the other way around.
(pedophillia should be stigmatized though, I believe there's a difference between doing those two things)
There should be avenues for pedophiles provided by the government, I'm sure many of them would want to be chemically castrated so that should be made readily available.
And I don't have to explain what would make children attractive because I have no frame of reference for that, that is't a gotcha question.

slippery slope fallacy breh. Being attracted to children isn't an orientation, so there is no sociological reason to legitimize the urges of pedos. If you're trying to decrease children being molested, which is the better route to take:
a. Socially destigmatizing an attraction to children, publicly legitimizing children as viable options for sexual attention

or
b. Having social and legal rules in place to admonish and punish those who have an attraction to children

b is probably really hard on pedos feelings and I guess that sucks for them but I'd rather it be widely accepted for people to not to look at children that way and that looking at children that way is bad.


edit, to add onto why I don't believe it's an orientation, if a pedo is attracted a little girl, his "orientation" shouldn't stop him from being attracted to that same girl when she's 18. If he can't, then it's not that specific girl that he is attracted to. It's the underdevelopedness of that little girl that he likes. That doesn't seem like an orientation to me.

 

[Pifferry]

slippery slope fallacy breh. Being attracted to children isn't an orientation, so there is no sociological reason to legitimize the urges of pedos. If you're trying to decrease children being molested, which is the better route to take:
a. Socially destigmatizing an attraction to children, publicly legitimizing children as viable options for sexual attention

or
b. Having social and legal rules in place to admonish and punish those who have an attraction to children

b is probably really hard on pedos feelings and I guess that sucks for them but I'd rather it be widely accepted for people to not to look at children that way and that looking at children that way is bad.


edit, to add onto why I don't believe it's an orientation, if a pedo is attracted a little girl, his "orientation" shouldn't stop him from being attracted to that same girl when she's 18. If he can't, then it's not that specific girl that he is attracted to. It's the underdevelopedness of that little girl that he likes. That doesn't seem like an orientation to me.

I don't believe laws like that lead to less crime so I dunno, but whatever method allows them to get whatever help they need through the government without having their lives ruined
I believe that would lead to less molestation.

 

[Mr.Logic]

Your mind isn't truly developed until like 25. Also, a kid really can't think for his/or herself. So, this is predatory. To answer the question NO what type of sick sh-t is this?

Are implying that sex and any other act that requires consent should only be lawful after age 25?

The average North American girl loses her virginity at 15-16....So, girls are not going to wait until their minds "are truly developed" to explore their sexuality...Neither will boys...

From age 14 and up, I personally don't have beef with it...A 14 year old is mature enough to say yes or no to sex...Part of the sex game is an individual with more social power coercing another with less social power into a sexual act...Age doesn't really matter...

Sex is not the big deal that we make it out to be...Especially now that we have effective contraception...The REAL concern with sex for humans age 14 and older is sexually transmitted infections...

 

[SirReginald]

Are implying that sex and any other act that requires consent should only be lawful after age 25?

The average North American girl loses her virginity at 15-16....So, girls are not going to wait until their minds "are truly developed" to explore their sexuality...Neither will boys...

From age 14 and up, I personally don't have beef with it...A 14 year old is mature enough to say yes or no to sex...Part of the sex game is an individual with more social power coercing another with less social power into a sexual act...Age doesn't really matter...

Sex is not the big deal that we make it out to be...Especially now that we have effective contraception...The REAL concern with sex for humans age 14 and older is sexually transmitted infections...

I never said that.

 

[88m3]

thread belongs in the bushes

 

[the cac mamba]

What about them?

they going to hell?

 

[Jack Trippa 3z company ho]

they going to hell?

I'm not God, I don't know. But I can put it like this: the non violent ones that believe in God and live an honest and moral life have a better chance than someone such as yourself, who is Godless and therefore lacking morals, and doesn't lead a virtuous life.

 

[the cac mamba]

I'm not God, I don't know. But I can put it like this: the non violent ones that believe in God and live an honest and moral life have a better chance than someone such as yourself, who is Godless and therefore lacking morals, and doesn't lead a virtuous life.

the hypocrisy

if you cant make the first judgment, who the fukk are you to tell me what virtues are