Art Barr
INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
POWs forced to assimilate aint the same as chattel slavery
where do you think a slaves, of any type.
where do you think they first came from?
art barr
POWs forced to assimilate aint the same as chattel slavery
where do you think a slaves, of any type.
where do you think they first came from?
art barr
Once you get your emotions out of it it's a 5 star thread.
Very informative.
It was actually the moors in the 8th century who laid claim to Spain with the use of a the same type of weapon the Chinese used Centuries after,, Europeans invented the actual rifle with firing mechanisms in the 15th century that they used to drive the moors out of Spain .. So yeah @BrothaZay is right,,
Can you provide a reference for that info?
The Moors had an insatiable lust for knowledge, and acquired it from East and West, translating into Arabic all they could find, even ransacking monasteries for rare books. One king had a private library of 600,000 books! In Moorish Spain education was available to the most humble, while in Christian Europe 99% of the populace were illiterate, including kings.
The incredible city of Cordova had 800 public schools! The Moors made great advances in mathematics, physics, astronomy, medicine, botany, and chemistry. The Moors also introduced the first shooting mechanisms or rifles known as fire sticks! -Which revolutionized European military science, ultimately causing their downfall when their enemies used gunpowder to drive them back into Africa.
Europeans did have advanced weapons but they weren't able to withstand the climate of africa. Alot of them actually ended up dying offThey came to Africa with advanced weaponry guns and s)hips. Africa had weapons but not guns so it was a wrap. Its not like they didn't fight to defend the continent when the Europeans arrived. Its like if a swat team kick through your door and you got a blade you might stab one or two but you getting lit up.
Slavery seriously needs to be placed in context as many c00ns aka fox news babies love spouting this "blacks sold other blacks into slavery" and "there were african slave masters" nonsense as a scapegoat to exonerate white people from the wrongs they have done and continually do to blacks in america.
Huge difference between a "slave" who would work for a period of time to pay off a debt or the punishment for being a pow, vs being branded, having your religion language culture names and identity outlawed, being brutally raped or sodomized, being lynched burned body parts cut off and sold, and so many other atrocities. To compare the two is disingenuous
Furthermore to act like blacks somehow deserved chattel slavery because of our past involvement with slavery and act like literally every body on the planet was not into slavery themselves is misinformed. All of Europe have always partook in the business of slavery, and so did much of China Japan parts of Southeast Asia like Thailand Indonesia and the Phillipines also dealt with slavery yet they somehow through the cosmos don't deserve being raped burned lynched and disrespected, yet black africans did deserve it because of a few pieces of evidence of Africans selling other africans and some slave owners in america? How hypocritical is that?