Adults still living at home is causing a luxury boom

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
34,281
Reputation
5,880
Daps
104,122
Reppin
Cruisin’
Lol You can’t build up a savings account AND use the money to buy luxury too.
The article actually said, the luxury brands hope that the amount of young adults staying home will cause a luxury boom. Statistically, do we know whether these ppl are saving or not? The assumption in this thread and in this culture is that anyone who stays home past 17 is a leach.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,846
Reputation
683
Daps
56,129
Reppin
Las Vegas
The article actually said, the luxury brands hope that the amount of young adults staying home will cause a luxury boom. Statistically, do we know whether these ppl are saving or not? The assumption in this thread and in this culture is that anyone who stays home past 17 is a leach.
Yes, we do. No one saves anything. Even when you have the means to save no one bothers to. There’s umpteen reports that half the country can’t afford a 1k emergency bill
 

Renegade47

Superstar
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
9,832
Reputation
2,010
Daps
31,614
Reppin
North South East West
nothing wrong with this. times change and cant expect the same lifestyle as 80s and 90s adults when even economist are saying this shyt today is impossible to maintain.


be realistic.
 

Renegade47

Superstar
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
9,832
Reputation
2,010
Daps
31,614
Reppin
North South East West
The article actually said, the luxury brands hope that the amount of young adults staying home will cause a luxury boom. Statistically, do we know whether these ppl are saving or not? The assumption in this thread and in this culture is that anyone who stays home past 17 is a leach.
its one of the biggest flaws with american culture honestly.
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,417
Reputation
12,504
Daps
226,255
Healthcare system isn't prepared to handle the literal MILLIONS of boomers who will need assisted living, care homes, medical procedures, medications, hospitalization etc. The 'loser living at home with their parents' rhetoric is quietly dying down because boomers are slowly realizing they've shut the door behind them and the same kids they've called spoiled and un ambitious are the ones who they have to rely to take care of them.

Ain't that some shyt? Destroy the economy, oppose universal Healthcare, waste money on dumb ass wars and weapons, antagonize your kids, then turn around and look to them for help when you're too old to abuse them and you can't survive in the hell you've built :wow:

:wow:
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
62,754
Reputation
8,926
Daps
199,417
Reppin
BX, NYC
I thought you knew?:dahell: All these young nigs riding the bus wearing the latest Dior, Prada, Balenci, LV shoes with Moncler coats with brand new $1800 iPhones not having cars in an area where you basically need a car, not having jobs and if they do have a job it’s at a high turnover rate no security job like Amazon. I be thinking I hope all that shyt is fake. :snoop:But this is the everybody is rich era. I’d wager anybody who calls everybody a “broke boy” is broke themselves.:ufdup: Jeff Bezos ain’t calling y’all negropeans for financial advice. shyt, Bob who owns the home improvement company ain’t asking your horrible credit having ass for advice. Ol imaginary player ass era. :hhh:We need the with the army suits and Timb boots movement back to counter all this suspect pedo gender bender Eurocac fast fashion garbage anyway. :ahh:
Add all the travel and brunch nikkas do

Most materialistic time ever
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,688
Daps
119,464
The article actually said, the luxury brands hope that the amount of young adults staying home will cause a luxury boom. Statistically, do we know whether these ppl are saving or not? The assumption in this thread and in this culture is that anyone who stays home past 17 is a leach.
The article said luxury brands saw an increase in sales from younger buyers, not hoped to. But it doesn’t matter because my overall point was if anyone is in a shared living situation, meaning you’re not paying 100% of bills, and not stacking, they are a bum.
 

FunkDoc1112

Heavily Armed
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
20,436
Reputation
6,576
Daps
106,596
Reppin
The 718
what money are they stacking? anything under $100k/mo is not really anything special.
Yeah when I was living at home it was cause I was in a check to check situation. After 3 years I only managed about 2k in saving.

Now, when i finished ad school and landed a 50k job, THEN I stayed at home for an additional year to stack money (and pay off 10k in credit card debt from school expenses) and now I live comfortably alone
 
Top