After Referendum Venezuela’s Maduro issues permits and claims to 2/3rds of Guyana territory; UN warns caution; is War possible?

[Professor Emeritus]

a different critique he has over the legitimacy of poor countries using their resources

Lie

he’s against the use of oil resources to develop poor countries

Lie

because he thinks climate change means poor countries should avoid economic growth that uses fossil fuels to any degree.

Lie

the argument is not about whether or not Guyana would face economic or military struggles.

Lie

He is claiming his prognostication means he isn’t anti-oil.

I am against economies based on oil. I am not against all drilling of oil. You have repeatedly failed to distinguish the difference, no matter how many times I have pointed it out, and have lied and claimed that I push for "zero oil".

I’d say this exposes him as an intellectual lightweight who can’t admit he’s just so anti-ME that he can’t admit to just wanting to pick fights over silly shyt. If I had a different username he wouldn’t even want to argue. When its me, he just has to jump in the ring and he got caught up in the rhetorical net.

Lie.

Anyone can see that I don't engage in 99% of your threads. I had you blocked for five years and wouldn't even give you the time of day, despite you being up in my PMs begging me to come back and calling me your favorite poster. And I'm the one who can't help engaging?

The only reason I entered this thread is because just THREE DAYS AGO you randomly pulled up a four-year-old quote from me about Guyana and lied about what I said. While at the very same moment, you were pushing a Guyana thread that proved the actual thing I said was being proven correct. And now, instead of dealing with the actual words and actions, you're trying to lie about what was said and push an ad hominem attack to avoid the topic.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I am against economies based on oil. I am not against all drilling of oil. You have repeatedly failed to distinguish the difference, no matter how many times I have pointed it out, and have lied and claimed that I push for "zero oil".

OK.

You’re anti oil and using oil to fuel growth of poor countries. Now you want nuance. Seems like you proved my initial point…now you’re adopting it.

We’re done?

I proved that in the other thread.

The only reason I entered this thread is because just THREE DAYS AGO you randomly pulled up a four-year-old quote from me about Guyana and lied about what I said. While at the very same moment, you were pushing a Guyana thread that proved the actual thing I said was being proven correct. And now, instead of dealing with the actual words and actions, you're trying to lie about what was said and push an ad hominem attack to avoid the topic.

No one denied the threat or risk of resource curses. It literally wasn’t relevant to the thread.

You’re taking credit for a stance no one challenged or highlighted when the entire point that talking point was raised was to PROVE you’re a de-growth leftist.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Anyone can see that I don't engage in 99% of your threads. I had you blocked for five years and wouldn't even give you the time of day, despite you being up in my PMs begging me to come back and calling me your favorite poster. And I'm the one who can't help engaging?

No one cares. Argue, make your point, and move on. But dont whine about arguments. you love this shyt. This is what message boards are made for.

If you’re above the fray, delete your account.

Admit it.

I give you life

I validate you

 

[Professor Emeritus]

OK.

You’re anti oil.

We’re done?

I think continued reliance on an oil-based economy is a major source of international conflict, domestic corruption, and environmental devestation that will eventually result in the destruction of the world. So yeah, I think we need to fukking back off rather than driving the trend.

Are you going to actually take back any of the verifiable lies you made regarding my position and statements?



Edit: Oh fukk him, he started with just a 6-word post and then edits it into another ugly list of more lies. He really can't help himself.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I think continued reliance on an oil-based economy is a major source of international conflict, domestic corruption, and environmental devestation that will eventually result in the destruction of the world. So yeah, I think we need to fukking back off rather than driving the trend.

Meet the lefty Europeans who want to shrink the economy

De-growers of the world, unite!

www.economist.com

Are you going to actually take back any of the verifiable lies you made regarding my position?

You literally just proved my point. You’re a de-growth leftist.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You literally just proved my point.

You gonna take back any of the lies I proved you said about me, or nah?

Don't deflect to a different claim, like you've already done 15-20 times in the last three days. At this point I'm just interested in the test case now of whether you're even constitutionally capable of admitting that you lied. Everyone else has seen it, so you wouldn't be losing face.

 

[jadillac]

Met this French girl in college who's mother was from Guayana and her father was French.

She was BEAUTIFUL.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You gonna take back any of the lies I proved you said about me, or nah?

Don't deflect to a different claim, like you've already done 15-20 times in the last three days. At this point I'm just interested in the test case now of whether you're even constitutionally capable of admitting that you lied. Everyone else has seen it, so you wouldn't be losing face.

You don’t like being called what you are: A de-growth leftist.

You don’t have to accept your title.

It’s not illegal or even disreputable. I disagree with the stance, but thats what you are.



Accept your title fam

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I can’t take back what you keep asserting that you are

Seems like you have a problem with what you are instead of being accountable for your stances

Green-Ecoterrorist-battymon

 

[JackRoss]

Spend your days on the Coli talking about @JackRoss and refuse to speak on what's going on at the crib I see why they up and why you fled. I knew I smelled p*ssy goofy ass "nikkas"

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Meet the lefty Europeans who want to shrink the economy

De-growers of the world, unite!

www.economist.com

Holy shyt, why do you always post the most useless fukking social media posts and articles. Did you even read that? Did you think there was ANY insight or meaningful content in that article, anywhere, or did you just post it cause you liked the title?

I'm convinced that 95% of the shyt you post is just keyword spamming and you don't even know who or what is in it.

And then look at the fukking source.

Stanley Pignal writes the Charlemagne column on European affairs, and serves as The Economist‘s Brussels bureau chief. His previous postings include covering economics and business out of Paris and Mumbai. Prior to that he was the banking editor, overseeing coverage of financial institutions from London. Mr Pignal joined in October 2012 from the Financial Times, having previously worked as an investment analyst in the energy sector.


Your big Argument from Authority in support of industrial growth is a fukking investment/banking guy who came out of the 2000s energy sector.

You don’t like being called what you are

Yep, I didn't think you'd be able to do it, just wanted proof.

Do your real-life associates think as little of you as everyone online does? With good reason, I'm sure.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Holy shyt, why do you always post the most useless fukking social media posts and articles. Did you even read that? Did you think there was ANY insight or meaningful content in that article, anywhere, or did you just post it cause you liked the title?

I'm convinced that 95% of the shyt you post is just keyword spamming and you don't even know who or what is in it.

And then look at the fukking source.

Stanley Pignal writes the Charlemagne column on European affairs, and serves as The Economist‘s Brussels bureau chief. His previous postings include covering economics and business out of Paris and Mumbai. Prior to that he was the banking editor, overseeing coverage of financial institutions from London. Mr Pignal joined in October 2012 from the Financial Times, having previously worked as an investment analyst in the energy sector.


Your big Argument from Authority in support of industrial growth is a fukking investment/banking guy who came out of the 2000s energy sector.

This is a literal ad hominem because you didn’t read the article

Youre a zero-sum de-growther

Yep, I didn't think you'd be able to do it, just wanted proof.

Do your real-life associates think as little of you as everyone online does? With good reason, I'm sure.

We’re entered the insult territory.

It’s not illegal to be a de-growth leftist.

Acceptance is the first step to recovery.

 

[null]

fail to recognise mental illness brehs

 

[CW99]

Oil? Sounds like Guyana needs some freedom urraaaaahh

raaaaaaaaaaah