Agree or Disagree: There need to be more consequences for being in the red than inability to neg/rep

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,645
Reputation
4,087
Daps
103,888
We're talking regular coli posters vs. TLR posters. If Malta posted regularly on TLR his rep would be MUCH higher while if Napoleon's opinions were as contrary on the coli as they are on TLR he'd probably be +1000 in the red

:what: Napoleon posts all over the board. Practically only the female posters post only in tlr. What are you talking about?
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,645
Reputation
4,087
Daps
103,888
Ok, fair enough, accounting for coliseum aberrations is it fair to say that no good poster should be below the -500 threshold? :ehh:
Reps are irrelevant in any discussion on poster quality.
Absolutely irrelevant.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
19,197
Reputation
2,894
Daps
47,470
Reppin
Catch me in the safari zone
TLR is different from the coliseum, if you're in the red here you're in the red for a reason. Napoleon is BY FAR the most controversial poster on this board, Poitier is close behind, if they're both comfortably in the green then there are very few reasons for anybody else to be stuck in the red :camby:
They in green because they have the same fags reppin them all the time, its like a close circle. This forum looks like a high school, same posters jerkin each other:snoop:
 
Top