of?example?
They have the right to a government subsidy to pay a doctor, not a right to an individual's labor against their will.
Are they free to refuse service to homosexuals/Muslims/asians/women etc. without repercussion from the state?You seem to be implying that
"physicians(in America) are not free to choose who they will and will not serve without repercussions from the state?"
While I disagree with the existence of any such "right". I agree with what your saying.They have the right to a government subsidy to pay a doctor, not a right to an individual's labor against their will.
What's the point you're trying to make breh?Are they free to refuse service to homosexuals/Muslims/asians/women etc. without repercussion from the state?
No one is saying that there is currently a "right" to healthcare at this point in time. Sanders is saying it should be a right.While I disagree with the existence of any such "right". I agree with what your saying.
Are they free to refuse service to homosexuals/Muslims/asians/women etc. without repercussion from the state?


How far do you think Rand will go? Will he be in the final four republican hopefuls?fukk if I know.
![]()
What's the point you're trying to make breh?

You are not free to choose for whom you will and will not labor. Or in other words discriminate... you will be punished by the state should you try to refuse your labor.I think soHow far do you think Rand will go? Will he be in the final four republican hopefuls?
The field is pretty weak, and many of his positions resonate with younger voters. He is also making the necessary concession to get the conservative base to take him seriously.I say Christie, Rubio, Santorum and Jeb, then it'll come down to Christie and JebHow far do you think Rand will go? Will he be in the final four republican hopefuls?