Alabama church quotes Hitler on billboard

[ORDER_66]

My mama LOVES Butter Pecan...I can't stand it!

Haagen Daas Cookies and Cream.....

 

[GRAMMAR POLICE]

I been to some of these museum's and no there's no evidence there
once again your a moron unable to use your brain

I brought up black americans because there's no way some can see it didn't happen, its well documented
when the holocaust is extremely vague, because it didn't happen. Extermination on that scale would have overwhelming evidence there would be no room for questioning

if you don't understand that there's no hope for, but I would expect nothing less form 6 ether simpleton such as yourself

you can't even name any of so called evidence, once again there are NO AUTOPSY REPORTS from any of these poison gas victim, it does not exists

in these museum's there's nothing but a dress rehearsal for the fabrication of history

yet we ha

 

[notPsychosiz]

It kind of concerns me that they aren't allowed to quote him. Like he never said or did anything worth quoting. He was one of the most influential men in modern history.
Thats like after Benoit killed his family and now everyone acts like he didn't win all those titles and he never had any worth or identity outside from being a killer.
If Stephen Hawking or George Galloway or Neil Degrasse Tyson blows up a church tommorrow I'm not gonna disown everything they ever said prior to that as nonsense.

Hitler killed alot of jews, people hate him for it. Fine.
If they are quoting him talkling about killing jews then I see the arguement, otherwise I don't.

Ghandi used to fukk little boys, but he's quoted all the time.
You know what we don't go to him for quotes for? Quotes about little boys.

Maybe people aren't ready for that type of analysis... but thats my take on it.

 

[TooLazyToMakeUp1]

don't yall celebrate christopher columbus day? Yet you can't even say Hitlers name unless your shytting on him.

Conditioning through school and Hollywood that the Germans were the absolute worst when it comes to genocide, ignoring atrocities that purposely aren't taught or have been brushed over in history class; I wonder why?

 

[killacal]

@Master Teacher catching bodies left and right in here

 

[Truth200]

 

[Truth200]

We got statues and holidays of straight up racist demons in this country, and just accept it for it is, but go bat shyt crazy of hitler

The quote is ironic, because that's exactly how the so called jews revised history by making sure the children learned the narrative
they wanted crafted, and long behold the are in the position they planned to be in

if the jews were being exterminated and victimized, how did they have so much wealth and power in germany

when blacks in America had Banks and money they dropped bombs on the fukking city, that's oppression

nikkaz couldn't have shyt

They fact is you can't have genocide on a race that doesn't exists, that's how you know it's bullshyt
people didn't even know Marc Cuban was a jew because he changed his last name, so the jews have always blended with white people because they are white

Adolt Hitler himself was a so called "jew", and then he found it he wasn't a jew, the shyt was all lie these honkeys aren't jews

Besides TWO POOR QUALITY PHOTOS allegedly taking near Krema 5 at Birkeanu, there are no photos of any kind of alleged victims of the gas chambers

yet you can google lynches, hangings, from slave times all through out the civil rights era, and find iconic pictures throughout history depicting the violence against blacks in America

in 16 countries in Europe it is illegal to EVEN QUESTION the story of what happened of the so called holocaust

only a liar would have fear of investigation, what is there to hide

the fact that Hitler has been demonized so much, it's way too much, way too much, if he was truly this monster it wouldn't be a need to do hitler over kill

yet monsters like J Edgar Hoover are named after buildings in this country, when there's documented proof of his assault on the black community

no proof of the holocaust other than the history channel showing stock footage of hitler doing salutes and driving around in a benz

They not ready for the Truth on the Coli.....




But then again maybe they are.....

 

[ThaRealness]

It kind of concerns me that they aren't allowed to quote him. Like he never said or did anything worth quoting. He was one of the most influential men in modern history.
Thats like after Benoit killed his family and now everyone acts like he didn't win all those titles and he never had any worth or identity outside from being a killer.
If Stephen Hawking or George Galloway or Neil Degrasse Tyson blows up a church tommorrow I'm not gonna disown everything they ever said prior to that as nonsense.

Hitler killed alot of jews, people hate him for it. Fine.
If they are quoting him talkling about killing jews then I see the arguement, otherwise I don't.

Ghandi used to fukk little boys, but he's quoted all the time.
You know what we don't go to him for quotes for? Quotes about little boys.

Maybe people aren't ready for that type of analysis... but thats my take on it.

Yeah but the difference is that with Hitler... his every action led towards the annihilation of Jews. Cmon man....

 

[Marvel]

don't yall celebrate christopher columbus day? Yet you can't even say Hitlers name unless your shytting on him.

Somehow Christopher Columbus, Ponce De Leon and these other Edomites that killed 100s million natives throughout the Americas are to be celebrated and enslaved millions of Negroes. Most of the people that were killed in the Holocaust were not even Khazar fake Jews. The damn Khazar fake Jew bankers financed World War 2.

 

[Marvel]

Conditioning through school and Hollywood that the Germans were the absolute worst when it comes to genocide, ignoring atrocities that purposely aren't taught or have been brushed over in history class; I wonder why?

That is the reason why we see such outrage when Hitler is brought up but nobody bats an eye when we talk about Columbus, Ponce De Leon and that devil Andrew Jackson and the rest of his friends. This is part of the Khazar fake Jew conditioning in Amerikkka. They teach you that those same people financed the slave trade and stole the identity and land of the real Jews.

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Khazar_myth

Many argue that genetic studies on Jewish populations have refuted any claims of significant Khazar lineage, and have shown that most ethnic Jews draw their roots from the Middle East.[3]A genetic study led by Gil Atzmon found that European Jews were most closely related to Middle-Eastern Jews, Palestinians, Druze, and non-Jewish Southern Europeans - evidence inconsistent with Khazar/Slavic hypotheses.[4] Another genetic study led by Doron Behar found that, despite admixture from local populations, autosomal genetic samples from the Ashkenazi Jews, Caucasian Jews, Middle Eastern Jews, North African Jews, and Sephardi Jews form a relatively tight genetic cluster which overlaps with Samaritans and Israeli Druze which is strongly indicative of common Levantine ancestry[5]

This argument has been challenged by one recent genetic study by Johns Hopkins University geneticist Dr. Eran Elhaik.[6][7] However, Elhaik’s study does not fully address the findings of previous studies, particularly the overlap between Ashkenazi Jewish populations and native endogamous Levantine populations such as the Samaritans and Druze. Elhaik’s use of Palestinian Arabs as representative of ancestral Israelite genetics is questionable in light of previous genetic studies which have uncovered evidence of significant African gene flow present in Arab, but not non-Arab Middle-Eastern populations.[8][9] Blogger Razib Khan argues Elhaik’s conclusions rely on poorly reasoned assumptions and that “the Caucasian component that is being detected in this paper may simply be a indigenous Middle Eastern ancestral element which has now been somewhat displaced northward in its modal frequency due to the expansion of the Arabs.” [10]

None of these studies of Ashkenazi Jews have detected evidence of a significant Central or East Asian genetic component which is present in other Turkic populations. The actual Khazars would likely have been assimilated by the Krymchaks (Crimean Jews) following the fall of the Khazars. Even so, the Krymchaks had a long history of assimilating other Jews who came to the Crimea, so their ancestry is still largely Levantine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_theory_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry#Genetics

The last 15 years has seen a plethora of genetic research on Jewish populations worldwide. "The consensus research holds that most Ashkenazi Jews, as well as many Jews tracing their lineage to Italy, North Africa, Iraq, Iran, Kurdish regions and Yemen, share common paternal haplotypes also found among many Arabs from Palestine, Lebanon and Syria."[67] While this consensus applies to genetic studies on the paternal Y chromosome, genetic studies on the maternal X chromosome "have proved difficult to assign to a source population,"[68] with one study showing "four founding mtDNAs, likely of Near Eastern ancestry,"[69] and at least one other study showing "a substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages."[68][70]

A 2001 study found that Jews were closer to groups in the north of the Fertile Crescent (Kurds, Assyrians, Turks, and Armenians) than to their Arab neighbors, whose "chromosomes might have been introduced through migrations from the Arabian Peninsula during the last two millennia."[71]

A 2003 study of the Y chromosome by Behar et al. points to multiple origins for Ashkenazi Levites, a priestly class who comprise approximately 4% of Ashkenazi Jews. It found that haplogroup R1a1a (R-M17), which is uncommon in the Middle East or among Sephardi Jews, but dominant in Eastern Europe, is present in over 50% of Ashkenazi Levites, while the rest of Ashkenazi Levites' paternal lineage is of apparent Middle Eastern origin. Behar suggested a founding event, probably involving one or very few European men, occurring at a time close to the initial formation and settlement of the Ashkenazi community as a possible explanation.[72] Nebel, Behar and Goldstein speculate that this may indicate a Khazar origin.[73]

In 2010, Atzmon et al. presented work refuting large-scale genetic contributions of Central and Eastern European and Slavic populations to the formation of Ashkenazi Jewry. Ashkenazi Jews, part of European/Syrian Jewish populations, shared a proximity to each other and to French, Northern Italian, and Sardinian populations which was found to be incompatible with any theory maintaining that the Askhenazi were direct lineal descendants of Khazars or Slavs. They did allow that some Slavic or Khazarian admixture might have taken place during the second millennium, and noted that the 7.5% prevalence of the R1a1 haplogroup., common among Ukrainians, Russians and Sorbs, as well as among Central Asian populations, among Ashkenazi Jews has led to interpretations for a possible Slavic or Khazar admixture, although this admixture may have resulted only from mixing with Ukrainians, Poles, or Russians, rather than with the Khazars.[74]

Geneticist Eran Elhaik has argued that his genetic work proves the Khazar hypothesis. Elhaik writes: "Strong evidence for the Khazarian hypothesis is the clustering of European Jews with the populations that reside on opposite ends of ancient Khazaria: Armenians, Georgians, and Azerbaijani Jews. Because Caucasus populations remained relatively isolated in the Caucasus region and because there are no records of Caucasus populations mass-migrating to Eastern and Central Europe prior to the fall of Khazaria (Balanovsky et al. 2011), these findings imply a shared origin for European Jews and Caucasus populations."[75] Elhaik's conclusions were widely reported.[76]

However, the majority consensus of geneticists conducting Jewish genetic experimentation have refuted Dr. Elhaik's methods and work. University of Arizona geneticist Michael Hammer called Elhaik's premise "unrealistic," calling Elhaik and other Khazarian hypothesis proponents "outlier folks… who have a minority view that’s not supported scientifically. I think the arguments they make are pretty weak and stretching what we know." Marcus Feldman, director of Stanford University's Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, echoes Hammer. "If you take all of the careful genetic population analysis that has been done over the last 15 years… there’s no doubt about the common Middle Eastern origin," he said. He added that Elhaik’s paper "is sort of a one-off." Elhaik’s statistical analysis would not pass muster with most contemporary scholars, Feldman said: "He appears to be applying the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody else has obtained from essentially similar data."[77]

David Goldstein argues that there are some plausible elements to the theory, stating that a genetic link of Ashkenazi Levites to Khazars "now seems to me plausible, if not likely".[78]

In 2013, the results of the largest genetic study on Jews released by the Wayne State University found that Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews shared substantial genetic ancestry, that they derive from Middle Eastern and European populations and found no detectable Khazar genetic origins.

 

[Truth200]

They teach you that those same people financed the slave trade and stole the identity and land of the real Jews.

Please elaborate.....

 

[ThaRealness]

SMH at the stupidity in this thread. Nothing Hitler said is worth quoting, because his underlying philosophy is garbage. He was charismatic, certainly, and he had the ability to sugarcoat his ideals and beliefs to make them accessible. But everything he did was fueled by hate.

Take the quote in the OP for instance. . He's talking about 'owning' the youth. Not influencing them. That's faschism right there..... the political state has ownership of the people.

The real significance of this quote is it's faschist undertones. I agree with the idea that we shouldnt gloss over historical figures such as Hitler. it's important to examine the psychology of such an evil person, and the social dynamics which led to the holocaust.

But to suggest that Hitler's ideas had any moral or intellectual worth is absurd. He was speaking from a place of pure hate.

 

[NotaPAWG]

SMH at the stupidity in this thread. Nothing Hitler said is worth quoting, because his underlying philosophy is garbage. He was charismatic, certainly, and he had the ability to sugarcoat his ideals and beliefs to make them accessible. But everything he did was fueled by hate.

Take the quote in the OP for instance. . He's talking about 'owning' the youth. Not influencing them. That's faschism right there..... the political state has ownership of the people.

The real significance of this quote is it's faschist undertones. I agree with the idea that we shouldnt gloss over historical figures such as Hitler. it's important to examine the psychology of such an evil person, and the social dynamics which led to the holocaust.

But to suggest that Hitler's ideas had any moral or intellectual worth is absurd. He was speaking from a place of pure hate.

He spoke from a place of hate, obviously but he spoke from the place of an oppressor with an objective... Hitler was a master of deception and I think there is something to learn from his brutal honesty regarding how he basically explained HOW he deceived people. He has a lot of great quotes that are still relevant regarding our ability to be deceived and controlled so easily.

Just because someone speaks from a place of hate, doesn't mean there isn't something to be learned from them..like Republicans, the right, rascists, white supremacists etc etc they are hateful group of awful people..but you gotta know your enemy and how they think and operate

 

[ThaRealness]

He spoke from a place of hate, obviously but he spoke from the place of an oppressor with an objective... Hitler was a master of deception and I think there is something to learn from his brutal honesty regarding how he basically explained HOW he deceived people.

Just because someone speaks from a place of hate, doesn't mean there isn't something to be learned from them..like Republicans, the right, rascists, white supremacists etc etc they are a hateful group of people..but you gotta know your enemy and how they think and operate

Well yeah, there's definitely something to be learned from it. Im not saying that Hitler's words don't have utility value. But some of these motherfukkers are trying to prop up Hitler as an intellectual, rather then someone who's every thought and action led to the near destruction of a people.