Allen Iverson: I think I would have a championship ring on if Shaq wasn’t who he was in that series

Killer Instinct

To live in hearts we leave behind is to never die.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
36,942
Reputation
14,223
Daps
172,678
Reppin
LWO
I don't righteously find this outrageous. :yeshrug:


Kobe was nice and was consistently having prolonged stretches showing what he was about to become, but he wasn't there yet and he damn sure wasn't ready to lead. Frobe is my favorite version of Bean, but he was the "8th Wonder" at that point, not "The Black Mamba." A.I. was still considered the better player by most at that point. He & Shaq were considered the best players in the league. As a huge Kobe stan, it wasn't until mid '02 - early '03 that I thought Kobe began objectively pulling away from his peers and becoming Mamba.


As lethargic as the Laker role players were early in that series, I don't discount AI winning out. Lakers won that series essentially because of the Sixers inability to do anything with Shaq inside. Dude literally beat the fight out of Mutumbo & Matt Gieger down low. The Lakers best player got his points a lot easier than the Sixers' best player. Shaq was just a force of nature. Iverson and Philly possibly couldn't overcome that.
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,031
Reputation
4,791
Daps
63,891
I mean, the Lakers were the lakers cause they were top heavy as shyt...like legendarily so...I’d say he’s probably still wrong though...no Shaq and the lakers probably aren’t in the finals in the first place...Just as or more likely than this, Timmy has six chips... who knows
 

Bledswole

Slappin and clowning chumps for fun.
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
24,008
Reputation
-1,625
Daps
37,913
Reppin
Detroit
Folks forget AI not only took Game 1, but Game 2 Sixers were down three with 2:30 to go... that was anybody's game. Imagine if they took both games in LA coming back to Philly :wow: Game 3 was a 1 point game until intentional fouling :damn:
Sixers easily could've taken any of those first 3 games in the series. Folks better put some respect on :aicmon: he's right that if Shaq wasn't arguably the most dominant force the league had ever seen he might've won that series :yeshrug:
THIS
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,848
Reputation
-387
Daps
91,410
Take Shaq off of that 2001 Lakers team and Iverson absolutely has a reason to believe he would have won.
Well it would've been sixers vs spurs and iverson would've avg 50 against them with old man terry porter 1 kidney shawn elliot, injured derek anderson trying 2 guard him
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
17,437
Reputation
3,282
Daps
81,026
Reppin
NULL
If Shaq isn't on that squad then the Spurs beat the Sixers in 6

Nah. Mutumbo matches up better with Duncan. The size difference was too much to handle with Shaq but not with Duncan. And nobody on the Spurs is defending Iverson. AI is right. If the Lakers didn’t have Shaq or if he had a big man to match up with him, he would’ve got a ring. Giannis isn’t a center and wouldn’t stop Shaq but he and AI would’ve been nasty together. AI just needed another 20ppg scorer and somebody who could be a lockdown defender.
 

Trav

TTWF🅾️.
Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
37,966
Reputation
13,772
Daps
105,015
Reppin
Zone 6 BIA Silver Bullets BlockO
0c4e822c08dca6cda2f8068ef89e77c7.jpg
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
46,687
Reputation
9,256
Daps
231,250
series definitely would've been more competitive. Just a Kobe vs AI duel would've been 7 games of some amazing basketball. No East team really had anyone who could fukk with Shaq
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,097
Reppin
the ether
Wait a minute, we saw Kobe score 48 and grab 16 rebounds to close out the Kings that playoff run.

We saw Kobe, not Shaq, destroy the 2001 Spurs where he averaged 33, 7, 7 on 51% shooting. And it would have been higher if he didn’t sit out most of the fourth quarters of games 3 and 4.

:francis:

Nah. Kobe was elite on both ends that year. He dominated a far better team in the spurs in the WCF. If shaq went down, kobe wouldve just matched whatever Iverson did on the offensive end.

Spurs were not that good in 2001. People forget they lost Mario Elie, lost Sean Elliot, picked up Derek Anderson to replace them, then lost Anderson before the Lakers series. And little Avery Johnson had gotten too old to be useful. Backcourt was straight WOAT.

That left them with freaking Antonio Daniels (who had averaged 6ppg the year before) as their #2 scorer and 38yo Terry Porter, 35yo David Robinson, and 34yo Danny Ferry as their other starters. Outside of Duncan it was a completely :flabbynsick: lineup.

Pop's strategy in that series was to swarm Shaq with Duncan and Robinson and then cover Kobe with single coverage from Daniels (who was even worse at defense than he was at offense). He wanted to goad Kobe into shooting 40 times a game and keep the ball out of Shaq's hands. It wasn't likely to work, but when outside of Duncan the Lakers were better at literally every position and the bench, what did you expect Pop to do?

Same strategy worked for the Spurs in 2003 tho - Kobe took 27 shots a game shooting only 43% while Shaq got just 17 shots/game shooting 56%, and the Spurs won in 6. But that was really only possible because they had someone who could play passable defense on Kobe (Bowen) and actual #2/#3 scorers (20yo TP and 2nd-year Ginobli). In 2001 they didn't have any of that.
 
Top