Of course he would. But here's the thing, you have extremists on BOTH sides - ones who value #s too much and ones who value their outdated/nostalgia-skewed eye-test too much. I've seen a posters state that Curry would be no better than Steve Kerr in the '90s simply because their eyes tell them so.
This is the real problem. There are just as many of those eye test, back in my day, I played highschool and a some D3 ball guys who think that qualifies them discredit others opinions on players.
Personally I like to here from people who use and understand all the analytics but also played high level basketball too.
Also from watching A.I. I always felt he was a inefficient player at times but, it also was a different time. Now I think A.I's game with smart team would use his qualities better then they did back in the 90's and early 00's. He would definitely be a starter and would be just as good a player but slightly more efficient.