Forespoken got low scores cuz publications are racist(allegedly)
Nintendo gets graded on a curve.(allegedly even tho @Fatboi1 put that shyt to bed a few pages ago with them screenshots)
I am once again asking, if these reviews are so flawed, why give them credibility in the first place? considering they clearly are not reviewing in good faith(according to a few in the arcadium), why care at all?
or is this a case of beat your chest when a game(or game from a platform) that you like gets a good score, and likewise make a shyt thread laughing at a game(or game from a platform you dont like) gets low reviews?
and when you think a score is too high just say reviews were dikkriding, and when a score is too low the good ol "they just didnt understand the game"?
I would like an honest explanation
Here this nikka go again talking facts and reason

Expecting others to think for themselves and form their own opinions



wait hol up, hol up. 1886 was a great year.
gamefreak released a game that looks like it came out in 2004 full of glitches and bullshyt and still has 70+ on metacritic.