She says be mad at the people (followers) who make hoes famous and that men "shouldnt speak on women at all" and he said "do you speak on men derogatorily?" and she said "nikkas aint shyt. The majority of them".
I think where she fumbled was where she said men shouldn't speak on women, but when asked do she speak on men, she said "nikkas ain't shyt".
Feminism is about equality with men, so if men are not allowed to speak on women then equally women shouldn't be allowed to speak on men.
I think her position is wrong. Men can and should speak on women and vice versa women can and should speak on men.
But her logic on the use of the terms isn't wrong.
nikka is used as a term of endearment by black people (for the most part).
Doesn't matter how men use hoe or bytches, it's used derogatorily. In the same manner white people use the n word. Doesn't matter how they use it.
In order to use "nikka" derogatorily by black people, you have to qualify it with something else. She added "ain't shyt" to qualify it.
We can say "hoes or bytches are trifling". The "are trifling" qualifies hoes and bytches but the use of the words hoes and bytches is still derogatory.
It's not the same with "nikkas ain't shyt". Because nikka in and of itself is still a term of endearment and not derogatory as a standalone word.
