Mess World
☭☥☤☮☯ψ
Delete
Last edited:
America can't go to war because they will lose
- Thread starter Mess World
- Start date
Enough with the conspiracy theories, even if that is true, how does that make Ww2 The Vatican vs. The Rothschilds?
We got a policy of being prepared to fight 2 wars at the same damn time.
We're the backbone of Nato and the UN.
Were heavily spying on every one of our alliances and our enemies .
We regularly fukk up countries for profit and nobody can do shyt about it.
The biggest problem with fighting in the Middle East (terrorist) is that the U.S. is trying to fight an ideology that refuses to die..... I'm sure the West knows which countries produce and/ or sponsor terrorism but for whatever reason the West refuses to go at them or they simply can't........
All roads lead to Rome. If the Vatican wants the oil or a pipeline to Europe to bypass Russia then we are going to war.
Trying to find out more information about the pipeline to Europe but the only country that said no was Syria. Vatican owns serious stock in oil companies worldwide.
Trying to find out more information about the pipeline to Europe but the only country that said no was Syria. Vatican owns serious stock in oil companies worldwide.
lespaulultra3
All Star
I thought it was well known that the U.S. has the most powerful military in the world. We actually spend more on our military than every other country in the world COMBINED.
Basically, one side (the West, Qatar, Saudi) wants a pipeline running into Europe from Qatar into Turkey, while the other side (Russia and Iran) wants a pipeline running into Europe through Iran-Iraq-Syria. The problem is that the proposed pipeline running from from Qatar into Turkey to feed Europe has to pass through Syria, and seeing as though the Assad regime is allied with Russia and Iran, they would rather the natural gas come from Iran as opposed to Qatar. The whole thing is a proxy war for control of pipelines.
And big countries don't fight wars on their soil anymore, so they have proxy wars on smaller, unstable countries and foment discontent among the populace to support their actions. There is really no citizenry that wants to experience war on their home soil so that's why you have these paid agitators, militants and mercenaries to carry out the agenda of bigger countries. In the Middle East it's constant turmoil for the control of resources, in Africa it's puppet governments that have the interest of the West or constant unrest so African countries lack the stability of self-governance. Everything leads back to control of economies. That's why Europe is still as strong as it is today. Neo-colonialism.
Last edited:
Update :
Migrant Crisis & Syria War Fueled By Competing Gas Pipelines
By Mnar Muhawesh | September 9, 2015
Editor’s note: This article has been updated to reflect recent Wikileaks revelations of US State Department leaks that show plans to destabilize Syria and overthrow the Syrian government as early as 2006. The leaks reveal that these plans were given to the US directly from the Israeli government and would be formalized through instigating civil strife and sectarianism through partnership with nations like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and even Egypt to break down the power structure in Syria to weaken Iran and Hezbolla.
In his appearance on the RT show “Going Underground,” Wikileaks editor Julian Assange elaborated on the cable’s contents:
“… That plan was to use a number of different factors to create paranoia within the Syrian government; to push it to overreact, to make it fear there’s a coup …”
Assange continued, explaining that the U.S. government sought to make the Syrian government appear weak by causing Assad to overreact to the threat of Islamic extremists crossing into his country.
The cable also details plans to foster sectarian strife in the region and make Iran appear like a larger threat to Assad than it really was, Assange continued:
“In particular, to take rumors that are known to be false … or exaggerations and promote them – that Iran is trying to convert poor Sunnis, and to work with Saudi and Egypt to foster that perception in order to make it harder for Iran to have influence, and also harder for the government to have influence in the population.”
“f Syria sufficiently destabilized, it [Israel] might be in a position where it can keep the Golan Heights forever, or even advance that territory,” Assange said.
Indeed, tensions were building between Russia, the U.S. and the European Union amid concerns that the European gas market would be held hostage to Russian gas giant Gazprom. The proposed Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline would be essential to diversifying Europe’s energy supplies away from Russia.
Turkey is Gazprom’s second-largest customer. The entire Turkish energy security structure relies on gas from Russia and Iran. Plus, Turkey was harboring Ottoman-like ambitions of becoming a strategic crossroads for the export of Russian, Caspian-Central Asian, Iraqi and Iranian oil and even gas to Europe, assesses journalist Pepe Escobar writing for Al Jazeera.
The Guardian reported in August 2013:
“Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar and Turkey that would run a pipeline from the latter’s North field, contiguous with Iran’s South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets – albeit crucially bypassing Russia. Assad’s rationale was ‘to protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.’”
Note the purple line which traces the proposed Qatar-Turkey natural gas pipeline and note that all of the countries highlighted in red are part of a new coalition hastily put together after Turkey finally (in exchange for NATO’s acquiescence on Erdogan’s politically-motivated war with the PKK) agreed to allow the US to fly combat missions against ISIS targets from Incirlik. Now note which country along the purple line is not highlighted in red. That’s because Bashar al-Assad didn’t support the pipeline and now we’re seeing what happens when you’re a Mid-East strongman and you decide not to support something the US and Saudi Arabia want to get done. (Map: ZeroHedge.com)
Knowing Syria was a critical piece in its energy strategy, Turkey attempted to persuade Syrian President Bashar Assad to reform this Iranian pipeline and to work with the proposed Qatar-Turkey pipeline, which would ultimately satisfy Turkey and the Gulf Arab nations’ quest for dominance over gas supplies, who are the United State’s allies. But after Assad refused Turkey’s proposal, Turkey and its allies became the major architects of Syria’s “civil war.”
Migrant Crisis & Syria War Fueled By Competing Gas Pipelines
Migrant Crisis & Syria War Fueled By Competing Gas Pipelines
By Mnar Muhawesh | September 9, 2015
Editor’s note: This article has been updated to reflect recent Wikileaks revelations of US State Department leaks that show plans to destabilize Syria and overthrow the Syrian government as early as 2006. The leaks reveal that these plans were given to the US directly from the Israeli government and would be formalized through instigating civil strife and sectarianism through partnership with nations like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and even Egypt to break down the power structure in Syria to weaken Iran and Hezbolla.
In his appearance on the RT show “Going Underground,” Wikileaks editor Julian Assange elaborated on the cable’s contents:
“… That plan was to use a number of different factors to create paranoia within the Syrian government; to push it to overreact, to make it fear there’s a coup …”
Assange continued, explaining that the U.S. government sought to make the Syrian government appear weak by causing Assad to overreact to the threat of Islamic extremists crossing into his country.
The cable also details plans to foster sectarian strife in the region and make Iran appear like a larger threat to Assad than it really was, Assange continued:
“In particular, to take rumors that are known to be false … or exaggerations and promote them – that Iran is trying to convert poor Sunnis, and to work with Saudi and Egypt to foster that perception in order to make it harder for Iran to have influence, and also harder for the government to have influence in the population.”
“f Syria sufficiently destabilized, it [Israel] might be in a position where it can keep the Golan Heights forever, or even advance that territory,” Assange said.
Indeed, tensions were building between Russia, the U.S. and the European Union amid concerns that the European gas market would be held hostage to Russian gas giant Gazprom. The proposed Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline would be essential to diversifying Europe’s energy supplies away from Russia.
Turkey is Gazprom’s second-largest customer. The entire Turkish energy security structure relies on gas from Russia and Iran. Plus, Turkey was harboring Ottoman-like ambitions of becoming a strategic crossroads for the export of Russian, Caspian-Central Asian, Iraqi and Iranian oil and even gas to Europe, assesses journalist Pepe Escobar writing for Al Jazeera.
The Guardian reported in August 2013:
“Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar and Turkey that would run a pipeline from the latter’s North field, contiguous with Iran’s South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets – albeit crucially bypassing Russia. Assad’s rationale was ‘to protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.’”
Note the purple line which traces the proposed Qatar-Turkey natural gas pipeline and note that all of the countries highlighted in red are part of a new coalition hastily put together after Turkey finally (in exchange for NATO’s acquiescence on Erdogan’s politically-motivated war with the PKK) agreed to allow the US to fly combat missions against ISIS targets from Incirlik. Now note which country along the purple line is not highlighted in red. That’s because Bashar al-Assad didn’t support the pipeline and now we’re seeing what happens when you’re a Mid-East strongman and you decide not to support something the US and Saudi Arabia want to get done. (Map: ZeroHedge.com)
Knowing Syria was a critical piece in its energy strategy, Turkey attempted to persuade Syrian President Bashar Assad to reform this Iranian pipeline and to work with the proposed Qatar-Turkey pipeline, which would ultimately satisfy Turkey and the Gulf Arab nations’ quest for dominance over gas supplies, who are the United State’s allies. But after Assad refused Turkey’s proposal, Turkey and its allies became the major architects of Syria’s “civil war.”
Migrant Crisis & Syria War Fueled By Competing Gas Pipelines
Russia on the one side and the Vatican on the other. I don't want to see war but neither side has a history of backing down.
Red Shield
Global Domination
breh we would fukk up any country on the planet one on one
with that being said, i goddamn fukkin hope we dont go to war
Don't worry there won't be a draft...
WW3 is coming tho
