American Drone Strike Policy Discussion

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,703
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
What's the big deal about drone strikes anyway? They're killing enemy combatants*that are trying to kill Americans. They have actionable intelligence, which has a legal justification** that the people may pose an imminent*** threat to the United States... why is this being opposed at all?


*Any male age 18-45 approximately holding any kind of weapon in a group, in countries where the people hold a lot of weapons

**The legal justification for the drone strikes, paticularily against American citizens does exist, we just can't tell you it because its a secret.

***The definition of "imminent" is now anybody who the DoD or CIA thinks may have plotted against the United States at any given time or intends on plotting against the United States.
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,351
Reputation
1,355
Daps
13,457
Reppin
Harlem
in theory drone strikes are a great idea-inflict casualties on the enemy with minimal exposure to your own forces.

but in practice the drone strikes are completely unethical, because the wars themselves are unethical to begin with.

so while i prefer drone strikes to the alternative of sending our troops into battle to die and be permanently fukked up mentally, emotionally, and physically... the focus remains to avoid unethical wars from the jump.
 

ghostwriterx

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,905
Reputation
811
Daps
14,621
in theory drone strikes are a great idea-inflict casualties on the enemy with minimal exposure to your own forces.

but in practice the drone strikes are completely unethical, because the wars themselves are unethical to begin with.

so while i prefer drone strikes to the alternative of sending our troops into battle to die and be permanently fukked up mentally, emotionally, and physically... the focus remains to avoid unethical wars from the jump.

Pretty ironic in this case.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,211
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,222
:ufdup: unmerge these shyts
Sorry, irreversible. But a day later after being artificially kept on the first page by me and there and very few reponses to the topic. I thought I got it wrong, but maybe I got it right.
Take it from an expert, once merged the damage cannot be undone. :sadbron:

We make mistakes too, but when I make them it is an Obama conspiracy :childplease:
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,211
Reputation
5,472
Daps
73,222
in theory drone strikes are a great idea-inflict casualties on the enemy with minimal exposure to your own forces.

but in practice the drone strikes are completely unethical, because the wars themselves are unethical to begin with.

so while i prefer drone strikes to the alternative of sending our troops into battle to die and be permanently fukked up mentally, emotionally, and physically... the focus remains to avoid unethical wars from the jump.

Which wars in particukar do you deem unethical. Not the procedure but the principle. I am not talking Iraq or Afghanistan, I mean conflict s that we are currently in.
 

intilectual recipricol

Killin fake hip hop
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
12,041
Reputation
-3,865
Daps
16,527
Reppin
The Brook
The next few will be a string of posts in one discussion...

By their fruits - K. Crady

this was a long discussion where he obliterates zacchaeus post after post.

Rather than writing an epic reply to yours, let me try to cut the Gordian knot instead.

Among the words attributed to Jesus is the statement, "By their fruits ye shall know them." You can know what a person (or a movement) is by what they do, just as you can know what species of fruit tree you're looking at by the fruit it produces.

Now, we could debate for ages on whether or not an ideology can "cause" people to do good or bad things, or whether free will means a person can be good in spite of holding an evil ideology, or vice versa. Likewise, we could come up with all sorts of creative ways to explain how the Catholic Church can order and carry out tortures, exectutions, and brutal wars for centuries, following in the footsteps of tortures, executions, and brutal wars carried out in the pages of the Bible at express divine command, without any of that actually being "official" Christian doctrine or practice.

However, Jesus offers us a much simpler and quicker way to the root of the problem.1

By their fruits ye shall know them.

Christianity, Catholic and otherwise, claims to represent the foremost moral authority on Earth. Christianity (Catholic and otherwise) is supposed to be superior to all other religions and belief systems when it comes to morality or having a the right sort of relationship with God, Who is supposed to be the epitome of moral perfection.
Christianity claims to have at least some degree of supernatural assistance from God in the preservation of its authentic teachings and in empowering believers to live more moral lives.

By their fruits ye shall know them.

Jesus himself is portrayed making this point, claiming that it would in fact be possible to recognize his true followers by their behavior.

By their fruits ye shall know them.

Christianity (Catholic and otherwise) has a long and horrifying record of atrocities, wars, suppression of science, thought, and dissent.

By their fruits ye shall know them.

Christianity (Catholic and otherwise) has a record of brutality with few peers in pre-modern times (e.g. Genghis Khan and the Aztecs).

By their fruits ye shall know them.

The historical record as well as present-day statistics make it absolutely crystal clear that Christianity does not, in general, uplift and enlighten humankind in any way that suggests the presence of supernatural power. We see no evidence that it is inherently superior to other religions and philosophies, and it is arguably worse than some (e.g. Buddhism).

By their fruits ye shall know them.

Since tortures, executions, and brutal wars are portrayed in the Bible taking place at the command of the biblical God, it is no surprise that those who profess to follow this god should act in similar ways.

By their fruits ye shall know them.


Until these evil passages in the Bible are de-canonized and denounced by Christians (Catholic and otherwise) they are still part of Christianity, waiting to motivate the next generation of Inquisitors and Crusaders. With access to modern weapons and the power of the modern State, there is no reason that Christianity could not match or exceed the atrocities of modern totalitarianisms.

By their fruits ye shall know them.

It's really very simple. Because...

By their fruits ye shall know them.

NOTES:

1. Am I presuming too much to say that pronouncements attributed to Jesus in officially-canonized Gospels qualify as Christian doctrine?
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,422
Reputation
3,676
Daps
152,141
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
WOW. This has to be one of the STUPIDIST defence of the use of drones I have ever seen. Its blatant hypocrisy from STUPID, DENSE liberals like this whore Krystal ball that epitomizes why I can't stand liberals or MSNBC for that matter. Its truly sickening and disgusting what passes for journalism in this pathetic country these days....

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0CBvqHnhio[/ame]



:pacspit: :pacspit:

fukk this bytch, The Obama Admin, and any other idiot who shares a similar viewpoint!
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,928
Reppin
Behind You
Thatw as the dumbest fukking thing I have seen someone say in quite a while. Krystal Ball is a fluffy airhead who is too vapid to realize that she is a gigantic hypocrite.
 

intilectual recipricol

Killin fake hip hop
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
12,041
Reputation
-3,865
Daps
16,527
Reppin
The Brook
Read definition linked. No need to refute nonsense.​

I read it, all it does is describe how christians read the bible AND interpret their own personal made up god... weve coined the term SPAG

Self
Projection
As
God

its why no two theists agree, theyve made up their own shyt despite having the same book. Book says "A" theist doesnt like "A" so theists says, "Book says A but really means the opposite of A" and as coincidence would have it the theist also believes in the opposite of A.

You are a slimy bunch

:ufdup:
 
Top