BU-BU-BUT THE MIDRANGE
BU-BU-BUT CP3 AND BOOKER.
BU-BU-BUT CP3 AND BOOKER.
Analytics Nerds watching CP3 and Booker destroy Denver with the Mid-Range
- Thread starter UpAndComing
- Start date
IllmaticDelta
Veteran
Taking 3s wasn't the issue...
Suns proving why you can't win with the midrange in this era. Old heads sick.
CP3 AND BOOKER CHOKING HAS NOTHIN TO DO WIT MIDRANGE SMH
Ain't seen the 100+ posters who dapped the OP in this thread since.
En Sabah Nur
The First
This. But let OP keep patting himself on the back and loving him some him
Look at who the OP is, you dumbass nxgga.
Even more hilarious how he's the one saying that CP3 and Booker were winning because of the midrange, but now suddenly they didn't lose because of the midrange. Ole having your cake and eating it too ass nxggas. OP ain't showed his face in this thread since.
Quoted for emphasis.Ain't seen the 100+ posters who dapped the OP in this thread since.
Random poster believing that they'd make a better decision than a particular GM on a particular day is understandable. People have bad days or overthink themselves or get jobs they're not really qualified for.
Random poster believing they'd make better decision than EVERY gm on EVERY day is just fukking delusional. You have no idea what you're talking about.
If every GM in the league is doing something, it's because it has some validity to it. If you really think your strategy is so superior, then why can't even ONE person in the entire world use your strategy to succeed in the league? This is why the anti-analytics people are just being nonsensical - if rejecting analytics really worked, then someone would do it and win. It's that simple.
Random poster believing they'd make better decision than EVERY gm on EVERY day is just fukking delusional. You have no idea what you're talking about.
If every GM in the league is doing something, it's because it has some validity to it. If you really think your strategy is so superior, then why can't even ONE person in the entire world use your strategy to succeed in the league? This is why the anti-analytics people are just being nonsensical - if rejecting analytics really worked, then someone would do it and win. It's that simple.
En Sabah Nur
The First
You nailed me on a technicalityLook at who the OP is, you dumbass nxgga.
Even more hilarious how he's the one saying that CP3 and Booker were winning because of the midrange, but now suddenly they didn't lose because of the midrange. Ole having your cake and eating it too ass nxggas. OP ain't showed his face in this thread since.
When I said OP I was referring to the person that was originally quoted by the person I was quoting FOUR DAYS ago. I thought I was done with this thread
Oh, really, I never would've guessed you were talking about me.You nailed me on a technicality
When I said OP I was referring to the person that was originally quoted by the person I was quoting FOUR DAYS ago. I thought I was done with this thread
I think that post went over your head given that actual OP was patting himself on the back saying that CP3/Booker were proving their midrange play was shytting on analytics, yet somehow you believe that when they lost it wasn't because of the midrange losing to analytics, by the same principle. It's dumb and dishonest discourse, but that is to be expected by clown ass nxggas who're stuck in the past.
Now back-in-the-day ass heads are juelzing stating that it wasn't because of the midrange that CP3 and Booker lost.
Controversy
Superstar
You need mid-range to generate good shots late in the shot clock
Khris Middleton proved that last season...Middie is a double entendre for him
Khris Middleton proved that last season...Middie is a double entendre for him