Andrew Tate Charged
- Thread starter Caca-faat
- Start date
Because contrary to popular belief I don’t give a damn about that bs. Right is right and wrong is wrong stacking trumped up charges is bs.
But we already know this is some clown world bs and folks piling on because they don’t like him. Not because of any criminal reason but he doesn’t talk in a way that makes them feel comfortable. What kind of soft p*ssy ass weak shyt is that. Especially from men.
And the big picture in the room is this. His race is irrelevant.
So is he guilty or not???
He's done a lot of things that make him look guilty. Does an innocent person send messages like this?
* Also, he stated that he moved to Romania because they have weak laws on sexual violence
* He openly treated women in the house like they were his property, including making them tattoo "Property of Tate" on their bodies, controlling their access to outside communication, and forcing them to ask permission to leave the house or do other simple tasks.
* Released text messages between the girls claiming that it proved they were faking the case, but deleted messages in-between to change the context. When the full context was revealed, it proved that the girls even when talking in private fully believed they were victims of human trafficking.
There's more but that's what I have time for now. And that's just the stuff that's known publicly, none of that is directly from the Romanian government's case against him.
The only time Tate made me uncomfortable is when he talked about fukking transsexuals.
All that aside dude openly bragged about breaking the law and how he could buy out any prison he's in.
Well, now it's game time.
Fred.
He's done a lot of things that make him look guilty. Does an innocent person send messages like this?
* Also, he stated that he moved to Romania because they have weak laws on sexual violence
* He openly treated women in the house like they were his property, including making them tattoo "Property of Tate" on their bodies, controlling their access to outside communication, and forcing them to ask permission to leave the house or do other simple tasks.
* Released text messages between the girls claiming that it proved they were faking the case, but deleted messages in-between to change the context. When the full context was revealed, it proved that the girls even when talking in private fully believed they were victims of human trafficking.
There's more but that's what I have time for now. And that's just the stuff that's known publicly, none of that is directly from the Romanian government's case against him.
Yeah it’s vice so umN
Cult follower gonna cult. You can play the fukking recordings yourself. And he's said a million rapey things in public already.
Is respecting women's autonomy even part of his brand? Besides the victims' testimony, the texts, the voice messages, and all the self-incriminating statements, what about him would suggest that he WOULDN'T rape someone? Why even defend him from something he's made no serious attempt to suggest he's against?
Where is the crime. Is the crime just he said she said. If that’s the crime is it even a crime? It’s ironic how the women are only believed when they say negatives. Hmm seems to me as if it’s an obvious agenda.
But hey sheeple are going to sheeple
Breh, where does the term "sheeple" come from? Where did the concept originate? And who is it meant to describe? I really want to hear your explanation before you use it again.
Yeah that came across wrong. I just mean some times we dig deeper into subjects than others. Sometimes we believe what’s presented sometimes we don’t. It’s just in our nature.
Like I care more about this perceived injustice than I would potential for another due to this one being something that resonates with me. It may not resonate with others. I don’t like seeing anyone get swept under because of perception.
If he did it he did it. But he clearly didn’t. Otherwise they would have a slam dunk case and wouldn’t be grasping at straws.
The real question is what is occurring that they are trying to distract us from.
I thought you were trying not to sound like a cult member?
So two women sneak out of his compound, go to the authorities and say that they were being held against their will in order to be exploited for internet pornography. They state that they were entrapped by a "loverboy" internet porn scheme where they had been made to believe they were a romantic interest of one of the Tate's as a pretext so that they could be brought into the compound to make porn. They said the Tates threatened them with violence if they didn't produce enough sexual content, and that they were fined and put further into debt if they didn't reach certain quotas for content. They state that they were intimidated and threatened, told they were under survelliance, that their movement on and off the compound was controlled. The authorities raided the Tate complex, and a total of seven women testify that they were forced to make sexual content for paid internet sites, with one woman additionally testifying that she was raped.
You think "they" are trying to distract us. Who is "they"? What control did they have over these women? Why do you think anyone in power really gives a shyt about Andrew Tate or that he will be an effective "distraction" from anything?
Now, you are absolutely sure he didn't do any of it. But....
* He says directly in videos that women are the property of the man, and has videos where he discusses hitting and choking women.
* He tattooed "Property of Tate" on some of these women's bodies.
* He sold videos for a get rich quick scheme that directly stated: “My job was to meet a girl, go on a few dates, sleep with her, test if she’s quality, get her to fall in love with me to where she’d do anything I’d say, and then get her on webcam so we could become rich together.” That is 100% describing a loverboy sexwork coersion scheme.
* He has multiple voice messages where he tells a woman that he enjoyed raping her, that he's a monster, that he gets off sexually the more a woman doesn't like what he's doing.
* Women have accused him of both sexual abuse (rape) and physical abuse (strangulation) in the past. The cases were dropped because they couldn't prove it - which is what happens to 95% of rape cases.
* He has directly stated that he moved to Romania because they lax on rape cases, and claimed he's "not a rapist" but "likes to do what I want."
* He clearly was making big money as a pornographer off of these women.
What about that makes you certain that he is innocent? Don't you see how transparent it is that you've been caught up in his personality, and thus assuming his innocence was your only possible first move?
I thought you were trying not to sound like a cult member?
So two women sneak out of his compound, go to the authorities and say that they were being held against their will in order to be exploited for internet pornography. They state that they were entrapped by a "loverboy" internet porn scheme where they had been made to believe they were a romantic interest of one of the Tate's as a pretext so that they could be brought into the compound to make porn. They said the Tates threatened them with violence if they didn't produce enough sexual content, and that they were fined and put further into debt if they didn't reach certain quotas for content. They state that they were intimidated and threatened, told they were under survelliance, that their movement on and off the compound was controlled. The authorities raided the Tate complex, and a total of seven women testify that they were forced to make sexual content for paid internet sites, with one woman additionally testifying that she was raped.
You think "they" are trying to distract us. Who is "they"? What control did they have over these women? Why do you think anyone in power really gives a shyt about Andrew Tate or that he will be an effective "distraction" from anything?
Now, you are absolutely sure he didn't do any of it. But....
* He says directly in videos that women are the property of the man, and has videos where he discusses hitting and choking women.
* He tattooed "Property of Tate" on some of these women's bodies.
* He sold videos for a get rich quick scheme that directly stated: “My job was to meet a girl, go on a few dates, sleep with her, test if she’s quality, get her to fall in love with me to where she’d do anything I’d say, and then get her on webcam so we could become rich together.” That is 100% describing a loverboy sexwork coersion scheme.
* He has multiple voice messages where he tells a woman that he enjoyed raping her, that he's a monster, that he gets off sexually the more a woman doesn't like what he's doing.
* Women have accused him of both sexual abuse (rape) and physical abuse (strangulation) in the past. The cases were dropped because they couldn't prove it - which is what happens to 95% of rape cases.
* He has directly stated that he moved to Romania because they lax on rape cases, and claimed he's "not a rapist" but "likes to do what I want."
* He clearly was making big money as a pornographer off of these women.
What about that makes you certain that he is innocent? Don't you see how transparent it is that you've been caught up in his personality, and thus assuming his innocence was your only possible first move?
It’s as simple as this. You didn’t really need to type all of this out. The way you believe he’s guilty I believe he’s innocent. It seems a ton of people seem to agree that this is bs and a ton of people thinks it’s ok.
But what is right and wrong? I’ve yet to hear anything criminal. Maybe he didn’t pay the full amount of taxes but shyt that’s a bs crime. It’s government extortion at times.
I chose my line in the sand on this subject and it’s doubtful I’ll be moved. This is clearly an injustice.
