another retarded white person brought to us by Oprah

[Pull Up the Roots]

The self-proclaimed spiritual guru being a complete idiot and engaging with racist right-wing conspiracies isn’t even surprising. If not entertaining racist lies makes you a smug, elitist jerk, then so be it.

 

[Justise M]

She's getting ready to make her transition over to MAGA nutcase

 

[Space Cowboy]

Describing people on the left as smug elitists is a very accurate description. The cats, trump, and voodoo not worth entertaining it's a red herring imo.

The topic of this discussion is eating the pets and how being dismissive of it comes across as condescending to people though. Most normal people think it's ridiculous so are they being smug? Note I don't identify as left at all.

 

[King Poetic]

Oprah was a tool for these people to use and sneak they way in when they was left out , same how rappers and kid rock

 

[Marlow Stanfield]

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Describing people on the left as smug elitists is a very accurate description. The cats, trump, and voodoo not worth entertaining it's a red herring imo.

LMAO, people are not "smug elites" for shytting on people taking satanic panic nonsense seriously. Tone policing and concern trolling is bullshyt. Out here expecting people to be soft with you when you loud and wrong. FOH.

 

[shopthatwrecks]

if she not givin head johnson why should I care or entertain this peckerwood

 

[ba'al]

The topic of this discussion is eating the pet

The thread title is verbatim "Another retarded white person brought to us by oprah." Screenshot included below.

and how being dismissive of it comes across as condescending to people though.

I don't think being dismissive of something is why people would view someone as smug but covert manipulation tactics like intentionally misrepresenting the subjects/topics of discussion, passive aggressively taking jabs at people who don't align with you political ideology all while looking down on the right for being blunt in their biases.

Most normal people think it's ridiculous so are they being smug?

"Normal People". That's fine but I didn't read her tweet as being smug solely for not believing the pets topic but rather it being in addition to why some people view them as smug.

Note I don't identify as left at all.

That's fine I literally wouldn't care if you did. You're free to identify and side with whatever political ideology you like.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Better start talking about those Wiccan b!tches too

Why she now go back to goofy bytch mode

And she the same person pushing crystals to cure diseases. She's not in the position to criticize alternative religions.

 

[BruhManFromTheFifthFlo]

This whole thing has been hilarious

 

[ba'al]

LMAO, people are not "smug elites" for shytting on people taking satanic panic nonsense seriously. Tone policing and concern trolling is bullshyt. Out here expecting people to be soft with you when you loud and wrong. FOH.

@Space Cowboy This post is a Perfect example of what I am talking about.

LMAO,

So this cat already starting off with LMAO which stands for Laughing My Ass Off as you know. So you're leading into the conversation laughing and "shytting" on people. That can be viewed as being rude and condescending that's why I agree with the smug stereotype to a certain dergree. But does that mean all or every single person on the left is smug no it doesn't but I have to say that so it won't be another intentional misrepresentation or bait post. Also it doesn't mean in the single instance concerning the cats they are smug for not agreeing.

people are not "smug elites" for shytting on people taking satanic panic nonsense seriously.

@Space Cowboy Here I agree with his point but noticed I never mentioned anything in my post about satanic panic but here he is intentionally straw manning for likes. I just agree that the smug stereotype is accurate.

Tone policing and concern trolling is bullshyt.

@Space Cowboy So here I'm accused of "tone policing" or concern trolling but in the post he quoted me I am doing neither. People are free to say what they like just like he is and I am.

Quote he referenced me for context.

Describing people on the left as smug elitists is a very accurate description. The cats, trump, and voodoo not worth entertaining it's a red herring imo.

Out here expecting people to be soft with you when you loud and wrong. FOH.

@Space Cowboy So another example here is an intentional straw man and bait reply ended with a nice FOH.

So no I don't expect people to be soft in the quote I never said that. And it's kinda hilarious I don't think his way of posting is "tough" or "hard" if that's what dude was going for but rather like sassy and manipulative a bit. And as far as expecting people to be soft on here I actually been the opposite and say people should be free to post damn near whatever.

 

[Space Cowboy]

@Space Cowboy This post is a Perfect example of what I am talking about.


So this cat already starting off with LMAO which stands for Laughing My Ass Off as you know. So you're leading into the conversation laughing and "shytting" on people. That can be viewed as being rude and condescending that's why I agree with the smug stereotype to a certain dergree. But does that mean all or every single person on the left is smug no it doesn't but I have to say that so it won't be another intentional misrepresentation or bait post. Also it doesn't mean in the single instance concerning the cats they are smug for not agreeing.

@Space Cowboy Here I agree with his point but noticed I never mentioned anything in my post about satanic panic but here he is intentionally straw manning for likes. I just agree that the smug stereotype is accurate.

@Space Cowboy So here I'm accused of "tone policing" or concern trolling but in the post he quoted me I am doing neither. People are free to say what they like just like he is and I am.

Quote he referenced me for context.



@Space Cowboy So another example here is an intentional straw man and bait reply ended with a nice FOH.

So no I don't expect people to be soft in the quote I never said that. And it's kinda hilarious I don't think his way of posting is "tough" or "hard" if that's what dude was going for but rather like sassy and manipulative a bit. And as far as expecting people to be soft on here I actually been the opposite and say people should be free to post damn near whatever.

Serious question: why should anyone take the claim that Haitian immigrants are eating dogs, cats, and pets seriously when the police have concluded otherwise, and all evidence is against it? It's just the same racist playbook as Yellow Peril or saying black men are raping white women. It is racially targeted. Are you black or white? Latino? Asian?

 

[Brolic]

This motherfukking basement dwelling Malaysian piece of shyt has the nerve.

The police, city gov, and townspeople already came forward and said it’s not happening.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

@Space Cowboy This post is a Perfect example of what I am talking about.


So this cat already starting off with LMAO which stands for Laughing My Ass Off as you know. So you're leading into the conversation laughing and "shytting" on people. That can be viewed as being rude and condescending that's why I agree with the smug stereotype to a certain dergree. But does that mean all or every single person on the left is smug no it doesn't but I have to say that so it won't be another intentional misrepresentation or bait post. Also it doesn't mean in the single instance concerning the cats they are smug for not agreeing.

@Space Cowboy Here I agree with his point but noticed I never mentioned anything in my post about satanic panic but here he is intentionally straw manning for likes. I just agree that the smug stereotype is accurate.

@Space Cowboy So here I'm accused of "tone policing" or concern trolling but in the post he quoted me I am doing neither. People are free to say what they like just like he is and I am but that won't stop being from viewing you from their perspective under a certain light.

Quote he referenced me for context.



@Space Cowboy So another example here is an intentional straw man and bait reply ended with a nice FOH.

So no I don't expect people to be soft in the quote I never said that. And it's kinda hilarious I don't think his way of posting is "tough" or "hard" if that's what dude was going for but rather like sassy and manipulative a bit. And as far as expecting people to be soft on here I actually been the opposite and say people should be free to post damn near whatever.

The fact that you think my post is directed at you is telling. It is about Marianne and her concern trolling and tone policing while lending credence to anti Black satanic panic level fearmongering.

Liberals are constantly expected to be above the fray and treat crazy and stupid people with deference while "fukk your feelings" is the mantra of conservatives. I'm sick of it.

 

[ba'al]

Serious question: why should anyone take the claim that Haitian immigrants are eating dogs, cats, and pets seriously when the police have concluded otherwise,

I don't know that why in my original post I didn't entertain it either.

Describing people on the left as smug elitists is a very accurate description. The cats, trump, and voodoo not worth entertaining it's a red herring imo.

It's just the same racist playbook as Yellow Peril or saying black men are raping white women. It is racially targeted. Are you black or white? Latino? Asian?

I agree. I'm black.