But yall be using those advance metric to prop up that clown show in LA..Man GTFO with that "advanced metric" shyt![]()

Throw your yall young dudes under the bus all season, but as soon as trade hype for a Superstar gets going . Yall switching gears and gasing up these losers with meh efficiency, injuries, and baggage.
Between a year 1 rookie that is hometown protégé with loads of potential and bunch year 2-3 misfits that keep stumbling over themselves at the end of their contract. They are gonna leave anyway. So, who are you fooling?
The way I look at it.
Barrett on rookie deal for 5 years
Robinson for 3 more years on rookie deal
Dallas future picks/ Knick future picks
Bench filler
Is simply a better long term plan to build around Zion organically.
Vs
1-2 years Lonzo, Ingram and Kuzma or Hart
4th overall for 5 years
It's what you're trying to build and how you want to build.
Knick = Long term plan in mind and conservative
Laker = High Risk High Reward with short term in mind.
Sometes it's not the player, but the method you want to build a team. Building through the draft just a better option than the Lakers. The top 4 teams in conference finals where built on building through the draft.
You may hate it all you want, but choosing Robinson over Ball/Kuzma/Ingram is more about the bigger picture. It also helps that he shyts on their stats as a rookie. Our biggest mistake with AD was never getting suitable help at the 5 to keep him happy. So, I would like to target a 5 to develop with Zion. Robinson is great prospect to develop and is the youngest, cheapest, and longest contract of the bunch. I would value Tatum over him every day of the week.