Anti-quarantine astroturfing campaign

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
22,341
Reputation
3,966
Daps
115,324
:mjlol:

1. definitions
2. i'm out

semantics
[ si-man-tiks ]
SEE DEFINITION OF semantics

se·man·tics
/səˈman(t)iks/


noun
  1. the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.
    • the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text.
      plural noun: semantics
      "such quibbling over semantics may seem petty stuff"


did you just respond to my post about deflecting with semantics...
with another deflection on semantics?
:wtf:
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,258
Daps
89,576
I agree with both of those articles...
the main point being that greater testing and access to care would mitigate the virus much more effectively than a lockdown...

The problem is we dont have plans or federal support for either...

so lockdown is just a last ditch effort

:yeshrug:
A lockdown isn't a last ditch effort to do anything medically beneficial, so your conclusion makes no sense whatsoever.

It isn't the federal government's job to have centralized medicine, it should be the market of options, not any government, it moves quicker.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
22,341
Reputation
3,966
Daps
115,324
A lockdown isn't a last ditch effort to do anything medically beneficial, so your conclusion makes no sense whatsoever.

It isn't the federal government's job to have centralized medicine, it should be the market of options, not any government, it moves quicker.

1. the whole point of the federal government is having a centralized system...
that's its core function

2. if the free market moves quicker.... why isnt it moving quicker?

3. the articles posted recognized the benefits and faults of the lockdown... why are you only focused on the faults?

4. isnt it the governments job to step in when the free market fails....?
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
34,305
Reputation
6,725
Daps
52,755
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
A lockdown isn't a last ditch effort to do anything medically beneficial, so your conclusion makes no sense whatsoever.

It isn't the federal government's job to have centralized medicine, it should be the market of options, not any government, it moves quicker.

1-star + neg for #bro-babble.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,258
Daps
89,576
Ok good. Applied maths but it might be enough. Probably as part of psychology or some other social / softer science? Did you do any pure maths?

So I assume you understand the concept of R-naught and what that means (generally speaking for case growth).

Are you suggesting that in the absence of "extreme social distancing incl. 'lockdown' " that R-naught would have come down below zero by itself in the short-term?

Or are you saying that in a "let it rip" scenario we would have managed anyway?

Or something else?
LOL, nothing you said is complex in the slightest.
I literally presented you information and the opinions of epidemiologist , you know the field we are discussing, who said the lockdown is inefficient and not needed at all and has more negative effect in pushing distrust of the profession and government, than expanding treatment and being more concerned with healthcare.

R-naught doesn't come down to zero kid, you need to understand what the value is in relation to a disease.

This disease has a r-naught of 1.5 - 3.5 according to studies from the diamond princess cruise, they estimate around 2.28.
SARS had a r naught of 3 to 5, was demonstrably more deadlier when contracted, and had less media fear mongering, and was able to be treated with no quarantine or national lockdowns.
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,834
Reputation
12,650
Daps
227,747
To even think that I consider Bush Jr better than Trump is terrible to think about. Cause he was bad...but this dude Trump is the devil incarnate.

But even GW called out Trump as a racist. Same with Mitt Romney. Romney was one of the few Republicans that voted to impeach Trump. When you got Republicans from the Bush era going :huhldup:at the shyt this guy is doing you we are in a bad spot as a country and a society.

Why are the most ignorant people in here, have the loudest voices?
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,258
Daps
89,576
1. the whole point of the federal government is having a centralized system...
that's its core function

2. if the free market moves quicker.... why isnt it moving quicker?

3. the articles posted recognized the benefits and faults of the lockdown... why are you only focused on the faults?

4. isnt it the governments job to step in when the free market fails....?
No the whole point of the US federal government is actually written in the US constitution, the US was never designed to be a highly centralized top ruled nation. That isn't its core function.

2. The free market hasn't been allowed to move quickly in the US, there is a reason people are requesting the government to remove drug restrictions, testing restrictions, and people have been pointing out the medical bottlenecks created by the FDA and CDC.

3. Ther articles posted recognized no benefits of the lockdown, hell they literally ascribe no medical benefits to it, and both say that quarantines have failed.

4. The purpose of the government is to resolve disputes between states, resolve disputes on the lower levels between citizens, while respecting those citizens property rights, freedom of association, right to unrestricted speech, and etc...

If the market is failing, those who are failing will be driven out and their is a natural profit incentive to meet that unfulfilled need.
If the claim is that the state, can do that, all you have to do is look at the US government's need to protect big pharma, to see that looking to it is ridiculous as trusting a wolf to guard the hen house.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
22,341
Reputation
3,966
Daps
115,324
No the whole point of the US federal government is actually written in the US constitution, the US was never designed to be a highly centralized top ruled nation. That isn't its core function.

2. The free market hasn't been allowed to move quickly in the US, there is a reason people are requesting the government to remove drug restrictions, testing restrictions, and people have been pointing out the medical bottlenecks created by the FDA and CDC.

3. Ther articles posted recognized no benefits of the lockdown, hell they literally ascribe no medical benefits to it, and both say that quarantines have failed.

4. The purpose of the government is to resolve disputes between states, resolve disputes on the lower levels between citizens, while respecting those citizens property rights, freedom of association, right to unrestricted speech, and etc...

If the market is failing, those who are failing will be driven out and their is a natural profit incentive to meet that unfulfilled need.
If the claim is that the state, can do that, all you have to do is look at the US government's need to protect big pharma, to see that looking to it is ridiculous as trusting a wolf to guard the hen house.

so you're saying the government has too many restrictions on big pharma....
while also pointing out that big pharma is being helped by the government....

which is it?
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
29,008
Reputation
9,842
Daps
124,798
You act more like an agent.
Crying about me saying not to give the white power structure total control over our lives, such as leaving our homes, going to work, and etc.
You want the white man controlling your live don't you?
Why?



https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2004211
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/...tter_from_public_health_and_legal_experts.pdf

All state quarantines are ineffective, treatment options are prefered because they are science based.


Just got done watching the Jordan thing so I've only been able to read a couple of the pages of the first paper and they seem to be in favor of social distancing which is certainly a huge element of the quarantine. Saying that a quarantine must be guided by science is one thing (pg 5 of the first link) and saying that it is completely ineffective as you posited is another.

Given how effective this virus spreads I would have to come to the conclusion that the social distancing aspect of the quarantine is indeed guided by science.


Edit:. It's a short read. It actually aligns with everything Fauci has been saying.
 
Top