Any QBs more valuable to their team than...

[South Paw]

idk, is there any other team that almost went 0-16 to turn it around and go 11-5?


it's andrew luck, don't let these salty pack fans fool you when they have a solid running back and a better defense than the colts have(okay both defenses are kind of trash, but ya get it).

did yall forget that KC comeback from a few years back? come on now, stop fooling yourselves.

colts tanked for luck.

You also cant cherry pick one good playoff game among a terrible playoff resume'

 

[KOBE]

what does it matter if they tanked for Luck or not? the team wasn't dramatically better the following year, you can't makeup that much ground in one offseason. he simply turned the team around completely and was a huge help.

 

[South Paw]

what does it matter if they tanked for Luck or not? the team wasn't dramatically better the following year, you can't makeup that much ground in one offseason. he simply turned the team around completely and was a huge help.

He did help a lot, but they blew up that team and picked up a lot more than just luck

 

[HHR]

Why the fukk do people rate a starting quarterback based on the quality of his backup? That's some shyt to me

 

[Versa]

All QBs are extreme necessities.

If Joe Flacco got hurt we'd be screwed. Our entire offense is based off him making big throws down the field off playaction.

 

[WuDatWuDat]

Aaron Rodgers. They're 3-13 with Scott Tolzien in there.

Matt Flynn threw for 500 yards and like 6 td's in that offense

But right now I can't argue, his backups are garbage

Ben is close too.. lose Ben and Landry Jones is probably starting

 

[WuDatWuDat]

Why the fukk do people rate a starting quarterback based on the quality of his backup? That's some shyt to me

I'm not rating them that way, but when judging how valuable they are, it's definitely a factor.

 

[HHR]

I'm not rating them that way, but when judging how valuable they are, it's definitely a factor.

Nah, that's stupid.

 

[Johnny Vulture]

Packers had Lacy when Rodgers went down and they still only won 2 games. Stop

we can agree both QB's are viable to their teams. One QB is far superior though so fukk this thread and all these Luck stans trying to make him look good

My point is that the Colts don't win games at all without Luck. Their defense is trash and they have no RB comparable to Eddie Lacy.

I don't support the Colts or care about Luck at all. Why does this thread make you upset breh?

 

[XxBboyxX]

My point is that the Colts don't win games at all without Luck. Their defense is trash and they have no RB comparable to Eddie Lacy.

I don't support the Colts or care about Luck at all. Why does this thread make you upset breh?

Because u luck stans are annoying. Dude is good but yall make these threads to make him look better. If u think about it, the thread in general is stupid because most teams who lose their starting qb will suffer from wins anyways.