Sup bro, haven't gotten that autism cleared up yet? This may be the dumbest thread I've read since my return, great work!![]()
Sup bro, haven't gotten that autism cleared up yet? This may be the dumbest thread I've read since my return, great work!![]()

http://rt.com/usa/feinstein-drone-minutes-pink-418/Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) now says she has some serious privacy concerns about domestic drones, but it might have been nothing more than a children’s toy that put her over the edge.
Feinstein — who also serves as the head of the US Senate Intelligence Committee — has since last year been advocating for her congressional colleagues to implement privacy safeguards to protect Americans from any potential surveillance threats brought on by the small, unmanned aerial vehicles expected to soon invade local airspace.
“The administration is looking at a rules playbook as to how these won’t be used and how they will be used,”
Feinstein told MSNBC a year ago this month.
“So it’s a very complicated subject of new technology and I think we have to take a pause and get it right.”
But speaking to journalists at the CBS News program 60 Minutes recently, Sen. Feinstein shared a personal story that put into better perspective why exactly she’s so worried about spy drones. During an episode that aired Sunday evening, Feinstein said an experience that she recently had with a “drone” outside of her home had something to do with how she now views UAVs.
“I'm in my home and there's a demonstration out front. And I go to peek out the window and there's a drone facing me. Well, whoever was running it turned it around quickly and it crashed,” Feinstein said.
People really think governments, Google, Amazon, Koch Brothers are interested in drone, AI development, robotics and globalism to provide for a better tomorrow?
The same people who don't pay their taxes, use slave labor and won't pass a minimum income?
They're trying to create a permanent division between poor and rich or just get rid of the non-wealthy all-together
Some of you are still thinking in 20th century paradigms![]()