Anyone else notice that NOW the left wants to resurrect states rights.

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,020
Daps
14,761
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
:mjgrin: Lets reminisce about the Obamacare rollout ....Do you recall when the republican Governors resisting it were being called Treasonous vipers.
The Lefty media would sing about the joy and magic of Federal supremacy...How dare Texas and Nebraska governors decide they dont like what Washington is doing?

"Do States have a right to refuse the federal government...Nah thats for Kooks,conspiracy theorists,Crazy Militias,Ron paul fans and Racists ...the kind of people who wear Camo everyday ,avoid showers and have dirty beards going all the way down to their dycks.

Rachel maddow called the republican governers "Neo confederates"




Then Trump got elected and everything changed.





California Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom

We’re not a monarchy. We’re a representative democracy, so we have agency, we have a voice. We have the ability not just to navel gaze, but to act, to be engaged — to resist. We’ve got to dust ourselves off and step up, and not just roll over and act as if we don’t have a very potent role to play in our democracy, particularly at the city level … if he does try to build a wall, there is legislation in California to challenge the administration, by requiring the construction of the wall to be put to a vote of the people of California.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe

President Trump’s new orders on immigration are “scaring people” and no replacement for comprehensive immigration reform.

Already, the Democratic governor has promised to veto a trio of bills from the Republican-controlled legislature that would help federal agents root out illegal immigrants, saying his state won’t turn local officials into an arm of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“We are not going to deport ourselves out of this problem. Just stop that talk. You’re scaring people,” he said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”
HONOLULU, Hawaii – Hawaii leadership is taking a stand against President Donald Trump’s controversial executive order on immigration.

On Friday, Trump signed an order calling for a 90-day ban on nationals from seven countries entering the United States. The countries are predominantly Muslim nations. The order also includes a 120-day stop on admitting refugees and an indefinite halt on admitting Syrian refugees, media reports.

The move drew immediate criticism from the U.S. Senator from Hawaii, Mazie Hirono.

“It’s despicable that President Trump chose Holocaust Remembrance Day to issue yet another executive order that exploits fear of refugees and immigrants,” Sen. Hirono said in a statement. “This is wrong. I will continue to fight the President’s extreme, knee jerk actions that divide our country.”
Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Monday at an event at a children’s hospital.

“Administrations may change, but our values and principles as it relates to inclusion does not.”

Mayors of New York City, Seattle, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Minneapolis and other major cities also promised to defend their immigrant populations.
:mjlol: They embraced a core conservative tenet and are too Clueless and self absorbed to see it...

:lolbron:Liberals thought shyt was sweet when the Tea party was saying Washington has too much power,too much control...the presidency is becoming Imperial

:mjgrin:Apparently NOW the constitution matters more than executive orders


The irony is That thats exactly what the Founders envisioned...Experimentation..Different states trying different things..some will fail some will succeed and the others will have to copy that success.

Perhaps Trumps election is Inadvertently restoring the republic....
e908da92c754965b60b6a8c13b0be696.png
....
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
42,989
Reputation
6,697
Daps
137,581
Reppin
CookoutGang
That was creative. It seems liberals still value Human Rights and find the largest threat to that being new federal government policies. So they are opposing those policies.

But why not make a thread saying "isn't it odd that conservatives are attacking state's rights?"

:russell::russell::russell:
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,020
Daps
14,761
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
That was creative. It seems liberals still value Human Rights and find the largest threat to that being new federal government policies. So they are opposing those policies.

But why not make a thread saying "isn't it odd that conservatives are attacking state's rights?"

:russell::russell::russell:
:mjgrin: Not sure how i would go about making that thread..The republicans are divided in case you hadn't noticed..The constitutionalists probably wanna leave it up to the stares as well...Trumps squad wants to build walls ,Some say things are fine as they are just follow the current law.

Why dont you post some examples of the "republicans attacking states rights?"
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
1,005
Daps
106,185
:mjgrin: Not sure how i would go about making that thread..The republicans are divided in case you hadn't noticed..The constitutionalists probably wanna leave it up to the stares as well...Trumps squad wants to build walls ,Some say things are fine as they are just follow the current law.

Why dont you post some examples of the "republicans attacking states rights?"
Keebler threatening withholding funds for sanctuary cities and claiming federal marijuana laws supercede states that have legalized it.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
12,733
Reputation
9,773
Daps
67,444
Reppin
Wakanda
Anybody who uses ad hominems as a default when confronted with a superior argument gets an automatic:umad: from me.

How is this an ad hominem? Do you actually know what ad hominem means? :gucci:

In what way did I attack you rather than your argument? You did, indeed, use the term "the left". :bpumad:
 
Last edited:

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,620
Daps
17,471
:mjgrin: Lets reminisce about the Obamacare rollout ....Do you recall when the republican Governors resisting it were being called Treasonous vipers.

Did the federal government actually attempt to punish states who didn't want to set up their own exchanges? No.

Is the federal government now attempting to punish states who don't want to enforce federal immigration law? Yes.

:snooze:
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,120
Reputation
45
Daps
14,494
Did the federal government actually attempt to punish states who didn't want to set up their own exchanges? No.

Is the federal government now attempting to punish states who don't want to enforce federal immigration law? Yes.

:snooze:
That was creative. It seems liberals still value Human Rights and find the largest threat to that being new federal government policies. So they are opposing those policies.

But why not make a thread saying "isn't it odd that conservatives are attacking state's rights?"

:russell::russell::russell:

Mods could've just closed this thread and bushed it and the OP after these responses
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,620
Daps
17,471
Mods could've just closed this thread and bushed it and the OP after these responses

I mean, even if you were to look at the Medicaid expansion conditions which were struck down in NFIB v. Sebelius, it's barely the same.

Republican governors felt they shouldn't be punished for rejecting additional Medicaid funding for their own citizens by losing preexisting Medicaid funding.

Now, the Trump administration wants to punish states who don't want to enforce immigration law. They're talking about withdrawing funding for public universities. Blatantly unconstitutional. :pachaha:

GOP's best shot is to have the red state legislatures bring sanctuary cities to heel (e.g., Texas and Florida). But then it wouldn't be Trump's victory, would it? :troll:
 
Top