AOC exposes Zuckerberg and Facebook coddling white supremacists

The Prince of All Saiyans

The Prince of All Saiyans

Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
72,505
Reputation
9,399
Daps
124,702
source.gif
 
Basil of Baker Street

Basil of Baker Street

Banned
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
2,199
Reputation
-1,416
Daps
9,868
śïñe•qúå_nøn said:
Click to expand...


like this is pure horseshyt what she did here and dummies are too stupid to see why.

AOC: Why did you name the Daily Caller, a publication w/ties to white supremacists, as a fact-checker?

ZUCKERBERG: We actually don't appoint fact-checkers, but the org that does has rigorous standards

AOC: So you think white supremacist-tied publications meet that?

Z: ........

He literally just said Facebook doesn’t appoint the fact checkers so why would she follow up with “So you think white supremacist-tied publications meet that?” Because Facebook didn’t fukking appoint them. Sneaky tactics. If anything Facebook needs to look into the org and see why it decided to green light the daily caller.
 
3333broadway

3333broadway

UPTOWNFRESH
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
841
Reputation
-135
Daps
3,012
Reppin
harlem
Basil of Baker Street said:
like this is pure horseshyt what she did here and dummies are too stupid to see why.

AOC: Why did you name the Daily Caller, a publication w/ties to white supremacists, as a fact-checker?

ZUCKERBERG: We actually don't appoint fact-checkers, but the org that does has rigorous standards

AOC: So you think white supremacist-tied publications meet that?

Z: ........

He literally just said Facebook doesn’t appoint the fact checkers so why would she follow up with “So you think white supremacist-tied publications meet that?” Because Facebook didn’t fukking appoint them. Sneaky tactics. If anything Facebook needs to look into the org and see why it decided to green light the daily caller.
Click to expand...
Are you retarded? She's clearly asking him if it's appropriate for a racist publication like the daily caller with a history of anti blackness and other bullshyt as a fact checker for FACEBOOK
so you think it's "horseshyt" for a woman of color to ask the fukking founder of facebook why the fukk is daily caller legitimized by HIS company


you fukking c00n
 
Basil of Baker Street

Basil of Baker Street

Banned
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
2,199
Reputation
-1,416
Daps
9,868
3333broadway said:
Are you retarded? She's clearly asking him if it's appropriate for a racist publication like the daily caller with a history of anti blackness and other bullshyt as a fact checker for FACEBOOK
so you think it's "horseshyt" for a woman of color to ask the fukking founder of facebook why the fukk is daily caller legitimized by HIS company


you fukking c00n
Click to expand...

It's not by his company you fukking idiot. The fact checkers are appointed by an organization Facebook put in place. Like I said, if anything zuck should be checking into the org and see what went wrong in that decision making process.

Suck. An entire. Aids. Infested. Cock. You abortion dodging son of a harlot ass bytch.
 
null

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
35,089
Reputation
6,815
Daps
53,653
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Basil of Baker Street said:
It's not by his company you fukking idiot. The fact checkers are appointed by an organization Facebook put in place. Like I said, if anything zuck should be checking into the org and see what went wrong in that decision making process.

Suck. An entire. Aids. Infested. Cock. You abortion dodging son of a harlot ass bytch.
Click to expand...

Errmmmm Baz / Foot.

Normally the engaging company would have a veto. Example: Facebook is not going to let a competitor fact-check them.

She is asking (by implication) "why did you (Facebook) not veto it?".

NB. I should add that similarly Facebook doesn't commission individual adverts themselves either, but they control which adverts agencies allow to appear on their platform.
 
Turbulent

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
18,563
Reputation
4,458
Daps
57,524
Reppin
NULL
This is all for show. Professional clout-chasing.

They get their moment to show they are for the people (so that they can be reelected). Zuck plays the clock to not have to directly answer any questions (and some of those questions were stupid by the way). Zuck dodging. Politicians will vote for laws their owners tell them to vote for. Facebook has 60 lobbyists probably working full time, paid to pressure law makers on both side.

It's just a big show to make you feel like people are being held accountable (they are not).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top