Black Trash!
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Saying Conservative media needs to be reigned in is completely sane
Saying Conservative media needs to be reigned in is completely sane
A commission to rein in means limit or control. Did AOC not say the Congress might have to create a commission to rein the media in??? I'm just checking because that is what is says in the headline of the article.
If Trump would have said the same shyt people probably specifically you would say that is unconstitutional. That shyt works both ways though even when it's something you don't agree with.
You can't limit something in media just because you don't like the information people are putting out there. That is government over reach.
Even if I do think the Republicans and everything they stand for is trash and has been for decades that's a violation of the constitution.
When you say it, yes.Saying Conservative media needs to be reigned in is completely sane
I'm being lazy today and I don't feel like going and digging up a bunch of literature and going through it, but.....Both now and in the past there have been multiple rules and regulations that have limited what is legal for media to do, so it's clearly not unconstitutional to place restrictions on media. Creating a commission is also obviously constitutional. It's up to the commission to come up with recommendations that are just, fair, and constitutional in the US framework, and with the current legislative divide and Supreme Court composition, I have zero work that something un-Constitutional will be enacted. It's just fear-mongering to claim otherwise given that reality.
The intrusion by government into the content of programming occasioned by the enforcement of [the Fairness Doctrine] restricts the journalistic freedom of broadcasters ... [and] actually inhibits the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and the degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists.
I'm being lazy today and I don't feel like going and digging up a bunch of literature and going through it, but.....
The FCC suggested in Syracuse Peace Council that because of the many media voices in the marketplace, the doctrine be deemed unconstitutional, stating that:
The intrusion by government into the content of programming occasioned by the enforcement of [the Fairness Doctrine] restricts the journalistic freedom of broadcasters ... [and] actually inhibits the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and the degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists.
At the 4–0 vote, Chairman Patrick said:
We seek to extend to the electronic press the same First Amendment guarantees that the print media have enjoyed since our country's inception
Wiki isn't an official credible source; however it was called down by Republicans because it was controversial and a few Senators tried to bring it back but it's controversial at minimum and there is a question of constitutionality.
The government already controls the media it’s just unofficially. This is just asking to take the hidden hand out of it and making government control of media out in the public and explicit.
haha no thats not true at all
There is a massive conflation between the "govt" and "corporate interests" i guess since so many politicians are bought off prostitutes.
Saying news needs to be relegated isn't crazy
Thinking people like this can be de-radicalized is not only crazy, but suicidal.