Are all relationships transactional?

The ADD

Old Master
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
50,354
Reputation
6,868
Daps
105,314
Are all relationships/interactions at their fundamental basis transactional ie people are in it for what they can get out and will ride when its in their benefit but if you slip they'll dip, real quick.

Loyalty is very underrated. :yayo:

What do you think? As far as i see you're on a solo ride in this realm because thats how you came in and will go out. Add in the fact that you never actually touch anything it makes one wonder about the true nature of the game... Is it getting solipsistic in here or is it just me?


I've never been one to chill with someone just because they're rich, popular, successful etc as that just reeks of D riding but that always has been a huge motivating wave for many. Transactions in full effect. "What do you do for a living?" equals a change in the persona they present if they want in and hear you're where they want to be. "Whats in it for me?" seems to be a very common program running inside the minds of people. Most are not even aware of it.

For me its about the frequency, the entertainment, do you get my level of thinking, can I inspire you etc... and not the tangibles or assets. A lot of marriages (from the male and female side but more the latter) are predicated on what they can get. I was stunned once when a friend said "If my father is poor that is my destiny. If my father in law is poor that is my stupidity" and then went on to live his lyrics by marrying someone he isn't attracted to but tolerates because she is rich and now he's set. Transactions again.

Even a lot of parents play the long game in the transactional sense because "Who will look after me in my dotage?" runs as a silent program in their heads and they often use that to limit your expansion so you remain in the box they picked. What Im saying is if you remove the covers and boil down most relationships (in any sense) down to their fundamentals the vast majority share the same skeleton:



And yet this is never said out loud. Its always covert, implied, tacit. Well? Let it be known then!

V0q9wI.gif

By definition yes but “benefit” can mean many things with not all of them being negative so if they aren’t being benefited someone should leave if it can’t be resolved.
 

Amo Husserl

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
8,269
Reputation
3,230
Daps
22,935
Some way, shape, and form exchanges is gonna happen. Market equilibrium here is relative. I see your Janet and raise you:
 

Complexion

ʇdᴉɹɔsǝɥʇdᴉlɟ
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
6,352
Reputation
5,449
Daps
28,028
Of course. Nothing is all bad (or all good) in this realm, this is simply a thread about awareness of what underpins most relationships and yet is invisible to many. Speaking of:

Have you ever examined the tacit transactions at play when it comes to your family?

That one can be quite interesting and make for, uh, spirited discussion.
hubieskip.png
 
Top