Richard Fain isnt bad
Haven't seen his stuff in a while. He stays in that zone of not saying too much, good for him.
Richard Fain isnt bad
I feel like no matter how good your book is or how legit you seem on YouTube or whatever people will always always have an issue with something they said.Influencers are rarely a good idea. You're better off reading books and asking questions on message boards like boggleheads and r/personal finance
My point is it’s not that everyone is a grifter scammer or whatever
It’s not thrown around enoughPeople throw the word grifter/scammer around too much, imo.
I remember someone saying that most modern content like books, tv, etc from 1990s and up aren't that good because they are more focused on building a brand for the author than giving out knowledge and that people should look for info from books published in the 1980s or earlier if the want in depth information.I feel like no matter how good your book is or how legit you seem on YouTube or whatever people will always always have an issue with something they said.
Like when you say read a book then people before you said they are skeptical of rich dad poor dad. That book was recommended to me by a lot of successful people but it was first recommended to me by a teacher in college.
My point is it’s not that everyone is a grifter scammer or whatever, they are all famous because they were trying to make money and everyone of them has good points about certain topics. Some of them dudes like credit some don’t. Some are good at sticks some say stick to EFT’s. Some say own everything and some say don’t own the house you live in only own for investment.
I’ve learned some good info from everyone listed here and I’ve disagreed with something everyone has said.
anyone hawking crypto or who hang out with NOI adjacent dues don't get any spinI'll check the other 3, but the EYL guys get plenty of hatred for being grifters/scammers or bringing on grifters and scammers.
So if that’s true then where can we safely look for information?I remember someone saying that most modern content like books, tv, etc from 1990s and up aren't that good because they are more focused on building a brand for the author than giving out knowledge and that people should look for info from books published in the 1980s or earlier if the want in depth information.
So if that’s true then where can we safely look for information?
Because even though these dudes are building their brand through these books I feel like there is still some useful information in them.
Idk I feel like it’s a case by case basis
probably boyce watkins. one of the dumber educated people i have seen onlineWho's the old Black Economics/Business professor who had beef with Kevin Samuels/Average at Best?