Are gamers killing gaming

JohnB

Pro
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,260
Reputation
161
Daps
1,915
Yep.
This and some of the other shyt gamers let fly is getting kind of disgusting in my opinion. Its funny how that bullshyt Kojima pulled gets a pass but nikkas want to call out devs and act like the sky is falling when a game doesn't look like its reveal trailer or doesn't have locked 60 FPS gameplay.
Reminds me of the dark souls 2 backlash recently
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,492
Reputation
-13,829
Daps
134,904
When shytty Japanese developers with uncreative American developers starting to put a damn gun in every non-sports title, it made me go :ld: @ new games. I mean, when great, creative games been reduced to downloadable games and the sub-standard FPS is the flagship of your console, it makes gaming uninteresting and stale. I remember back in the day, where developers couldn't wait for the PS1/N64 generation to end to make more creative titles with more expansive worlds with new gameplay ideas. Now, we have the hardware, but the imagination is missing.

STFU
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,743
Reputation
4,259
Daps
116,787
Reppin
Tha Land
The entire industry is full of whiney ass grown ass immature men.

Literaly every game/system/story has to be surrounded with controversy and conspiracy these days.

Everything is a complaint, shyt is good until it's popular, then the people who like it are "blind dummies"

Even devs, and "journalist" fall into this way of thinking. I don't know if they do it cause that's what it seems the community wants, or if the communty does it cause that's what the industry taught them.

If gaming is to ever be considered more than a children's play thing. Then the entire industry is gonna have to grow up.
 

Khalil's_Black_Excellence

The King of Fighters
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,831
Reputation
1,631
Daps
27,780
Reppin
Phoenix, AZ
When shytty Japanese developers with uncreative American developers starting to put a damn gun in every non-sports title, it made me go :ld: @ new games. I mean, when great, creative games been reduced to downloadable games and the sub-standard FPS is the flagship of your console, it makes gaming uninteresting and stale. I remember back in the day, where developers couldn't wait for the PS1/N64 generation to end to make more creative titles with more expansive worlds with new gameplay ideas. Now, we have the hardware, but the imagination is missing.

Unfortunately, not enough of some of ya'll would-be "gamers" actively support games that have imagination.
 

KushSkywalker

Walker Lexus Ranger
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
15,008
Reputation
3,555
Daps
32,937
yes gamers have become spoiled brats with revisionist history

everything we grew up with is great, everything new sucks and is dumbed down

cept that ain't 100% true, ya'll sound like old white people saying hip hop ain't music
 

Zebruh

The Illustrious
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
5,497
Reputation
610
Daps
10,675
To this day, I still dont see what was so bad about the ending on ME3 for it to get such a negative reaction

Absolutely... Aside from the fact there was no predictable "final boss" that shouldn't have taken away from the experience you get with the game(gameplay, great story, plus multiplayer)...extended cut was nice too, but not necessary

The ending was bullshyt. It took everything you went through throughout all 3 games and the DLC, and tossed it in the bushes. There was no real impact whatsoever. Then they give you two bullshyt ass choices that just seemed thrown out there and far-fetched and expect nikkas to just be happy with that. Especially with the lack of closure.

It just felt like one big convoluted mess of an ending that can only be explained by fan theories on the Internet. For people to have spent so much time with the series, that just wasn't enough to conclude a story like that. Extended Cut was cool, but at the same time...that shouldn't have had to happen.
 

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,624
Reputation
858
Daps
22,126
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
The ending was bullshyt. It took everything you went through throughout all 3 games and the DLC, and tossed it in the bushes. There was no real impact whatsoever. Then they give you two bullshyt ass choices that just seemed thrown out there and far-fetched and expect nikkas to just be happy with that. Especially with the lack of closure.

It just felt like one big convoluted mess of an ending that can only be explained by fan theories on the Internet. For people to have spent so much time with the series, that just wasn't enough to conclude a story like that. Extended Cut was cool, but at the same time...that shouldn't have had to happen.
LOL what was convoluted about the ending?? They didn't toss anything in the bushes.. the choices you made during the game were meant to affect certain parts of the storyline..which it did... WTF are you so furious about?? The fact that there wasn't 12 different endings??
 

Zebruh

The Illustrious
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
5,497
Reputation
610
Daps
10,675
LOL what was convoluted about the ending?? They didn't toss anything in the bushes.. the choices you made during the game were meant to affect certain parts of the storyline..which it did... WTF are you so furious about?? The fact that there wasn't 12 different endings??

It's not about how many endings it has, it's the fact that everything DID get tossed in the bushes, for an ending that began to be too much to explain itself. For as great of a series it was, 3's ending was a letdown(the only disappointment I even have with the series to be honest). Not even necessarily the decision you make, but how it was introduced, and how open-ended it was left. If they weren't gonna give an epic boss fight, cool, but The Catalyst??? Really? The introduction of the Catalyst threw the game for a whole different loop and opened up way more discussion, in a whole new lane, and threw everything else in the bushes. No matter how many logs and extra cuts and dialogue goes into the game, his presence wasn't ever needed, nor is it ever fully . The Catalyst was a bad idea from the jump, nothing will change that. Reveal a failed A.I. that can only think in one way to be your main villain in a trilogy, 5 minutes before it ends for an A+ ending brehs. :aicmon:


If the ending was fine, there wouldn't have been a need for an extended cut. Bioware employees wouldn't have had to write letters addressing the fact that they're sorry we didn't like their ending. People wouldn't have had to take to the Internet to answer all the questions that were left behind and unanswered(forcing a thing like the Extended Cut and the Leviathan DLC logs to exist in the first place). Bioware wouldn't be trying to force the idea that Synthesis is the best ending through all the DLC and shyt if the ending wasn't convoluted and full of contradictions and unexplained conversations. ME3 built up too much to backstory to successfully conclude and that's why the ending sucked. Extended cut or not.
 

Hagendas

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
3,733
Reputation
940
Daps
14,017
Reppin
NULL
Putting visuals, Graphics and "Multiplayer" experiences above GAMEPLAY and STORY telling is whats killing it


ALSO DLC sigh why release an incomplete game just to nickle and dime us
 
Top