How aren’t they ?I wouldn't want to live in any of these cities. Cities are good for GOING TO. They are not good for living in.
How aren’t they ?I wouldn't want to live in any of these cities. Cities are good for GOING TO. They are not good for living in.
In what world is LA "deteriorating"?? Especially when up against rat infested NYC???NYC will stay on top
LA is deteriorating
and i’m originally from Chicago
![]()
Right wing propaganda. Most people live in a city statistically more dangerous than LANew York, yes, but people are legit afraid to go to L.A with all these robberies and car jackings. I really want to go to Universal Studios, but I’ll just go to the one in Orlando.
When I have to work at the office, I’m in Manhattan, and I haven’t noticed a difference.
How aren’t they ?
You still ain’t explain shyt. How aren’t they good for living in?It's simple. I lived just outside of NYC less than an hour away for years. Nobody around me. Quiet. Nice yard. I could go into NYC any time I want, experience whatever I wanted, go to events, do the nightlife and didn't have to deal with the rest of the bullshyt.
Living near a major metro area is > than living IN the major metro.
You still ain’t explain shyt. How aren’t they good for living in?
They are probably factoring in the homeless problem....well NY is 2nd.....In what world is LA "deteriorating"?? Especially when up against rat infested NYC???
but the black culture i grew up on from the 80s till about 2009 has went down
I just explained it. I didn't have people on me shoulder to shoulder and didn't have to pay some ridiculous price for housing when my house and yard was way fukking bigger and better and neighborhood was quiet![]()
What would the positive have been living directly in the city when it's there anytime I want to experience it?
AccurateYes and it’s not close
NYC and LA
then Chicago, SF, DC, Boston, Miami, Seattle
Then Houston Dallas Atlanta Philly
Then everyone else