Are the hawks the worst #1 seed team ever?

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

Hawks need to just blow it up and start from scratch. They ain't getting any younger, they've been thoroughly exposed and damn near every team in the east will be better next year. Their window is closed.

Just delete the little history they have and give the team to seattle

 

[Alexander The Great]

:scusttape: If only Pierce had an extra .4 seconds

Wizards would be getting molly whooped also

 

[AVXL]

Hawks need to just blow it up and start from scratch. They ain't getting any younger, they've been thoroughly exposed and damn near every team in the east will be better next year. Their window is closed.

Ok breh thanks for the advice

 

[pawdalaw]

Ok breh thanks for the advice

Anytime! after reading through your season thread this morning it sounds like a lot of you are taking it to heart. there's talk of letting Teague, Millsap and Horford go.

 

[Piff Huxtable]

2011 Spurs

Grizzlies that year tanked for the 8th seed lol

 

[ExodusNirvana]

Most of the Coli understood, that much like the Knicks taking L's, inevitably the Hawks would eventually run into an actual team (The Cavs) and get exposed.

It was only a matter of time

 

[Strapped]

Yes op the Hawks are pathetic

 

[Steezy]

Most of the Coli understood, that much like the Knicks taking L's, inevitably the Hawks would eventually run into an actual team (The Cavs) and get exposed.

It was only a matter of time

It was also understood you team would be at home regardless.

 

[The Goodz]

so a 62 win #1 seed in the conf finals losing to an early season finals pick is worse than a 67 win #1 seed with a player that won MVP the same season losing to a team in the first round

 

[jwinfield]

2011 Spurs

Grizzlies that year tanked for the 8th seed lol

That Spurs team > this years Hawks

They just had to face the worst possible matchup in the 1st round.

 

[Steezy]

so a 62 win #1 seed in the conf finals losing to an early season finals pick is worse than a 67 win #1 seed with a player that won MVP the same season losing to a team in the first round

Exactly..win two series but that didn't count

 

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

so a 62 win #1 seed in the conf finals losing to an early season finals pick is worse than a 67 win #1 seed with a player that won MVP the same season losing to a team in the first round

4 all stars and voach of the year vs mvp and 67 wins

Ill say they on par simply because the hawks let deron drop 40 on them and barely beat paul pierce age 83

 

[The Goodz]

4 all stars and voach of the year vs mvp and 67 wins

Ill say they on par simply because the hawks let deron drop 40 on them and barely beat paul pierce age 83

con finals > first round

Facts only

Regardless of conferences and the predictable hypothetical "well if the Hawks were in the west" reply you probably will say


And GSW betting them is considered one of the greatest upsets ever in the sport, are the cavs beating the Hawks even close to an upset

 

[wire28]

so a 62 win #1 seed in the conf finals losing to an early season finals pick is worse than a 67 win #1 seed with a player that won MVP the same season losing to a team in the first round

well thats if you want to limit it to that and exclude them struggling with a one handed Wall led wizards team or having giving them that work on a laughable bk 8 seeded bk squad. these nikkas inflated their record in a weak east and coasted until they playoff time where they've been steadily exposed each round

edit: and thats not even taking into account that team was better than this hawks team, unless you gonna say they aint

 

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

con finals > first round

Facts only

Regardless of conferences and the predictable

Barely struggling t OK get past bum nets and injured wizards only to get swept by a team with even more injuries is worse because the mavs were frauds and bowed out quick....hawks lucked up in the 2nd round and barely adjusred to edge the netd