Is Childish Gambino independent? Dude sold 50K first week with his debut album in 2011
Who cares fukk boy. Section 80 came out in the summer of 2011.
When you have money that you've made from strange, warner, and other ventures you don't need a label to back you
The only ones that are TRULY INDEPENDENT are the ones NOT GETTING AIRPLAY...
So why is Too $hort getting airplay with some of his singles?
LOL nah, I had a thread way back in the day with that whole TDE ish. Them nikkas was signed for like a year before they "official" announced it.
Even had their A&R before they went major come out of the shadows and post here![]()
That's awesome. What the hell does that have to do with the topic?? Or anything you've said??? Or I said???you do know anthony tiffith has invested in movies right?
That's awesome. What the hell does that have to do with the topic?? Or anything you've said??? Or I said???
Independent means you doing it alone. You don't have a company backing you. You don't have some rich guy backing you. You don't have any backing. Cause you're independent. That's the whole damn definition of independent.
If you got a crew. And your crew is doing it alone. Then y'all are an independent crew. You might be 5 dudes. But you financing yourself with 5 incomes. You don't have no help
The topic is, is this still going on... Does anybody blow like this??? The answer is NO
You don't get to claim you independent when you was signed before. You had a label, you got money and exposure, now you don't have a label so you're an Indy artist?? Nah you used them to push you ahead then kept it moving.
That's different than the guy putting his life savings into his career with not a single person helping him.
I'm not saying you wrong for taking the money. It's pretty impossible to go ANYWHERE with no financial backing.
But stop pretending that using up a label but it not being known, is some type of organic growth. No it was bought and paid for and not even paid for by the artists themselves. It was bought and paid for and hidden by the label in order to make people have an underdog to root for
my mistake in the definition.. i think that's what the thread was about.. has anyone ever blown up off their own dime... and i agree, i don't think i've ever seen that happen. even that jessica black girl who blew up off youtube was on a labelThat is not the definition for independent in music business. In the music business 99% of all music labels end up being owned by one of 3 parent companies... Sony, Warner and the Universal Music Group...if your not owned by one of them you are considered independent.
What you are talking about is being an unsigned artist with no connects, and no angel investor...
in which case its a pretty clear and unequivocal no, no one EVER blows up like that. You wont get a single spin on the radio, and without radio you cannot blow up nationally.
Period end of story, there has never to this day been a guy who just made music, pressed it up or released it on the internet, and turned into a legit nationally known entertainer with a charting single or album.
but you're right about having ZERO connects and backing... that doesn't fukking happen and will never happen. not nationwide at least... you're gonna hit a ceiling that only a label and/or money will break through